Yes these seems like a good change.
On Jan 30, 2006, at 4:00 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Hi Tim,
thank you for this long explaination. You did convince me, I am now all
in favour for your patch. Your patch seems to make scenarios possible,
that didn't work before. But this is not my area of
Hi Fred,
Sorry for the confusion. The specific case that I want to work is as
follows: I have a machine running GNUstep (call it 'localhost'). I
log into this machine from another non-GNUstep machine (call it
'remotehost') using 'Xnest' (display :1) to connect to the xdm on
Hi Tim,
thank you for this long explaination. You did convince me, I am now all
in favour for your patch. Your patch seems to make scenarios possible,
that didn't work before. But this is not my area of expertice, perhaps
Adam and Richard have something to say here?
Fred
Tim McIntosh wrote:
Hi Tim,
I read through your mail and your patch, but still don't quite get the
issue you have. It is a know problem that GNUstep will complain about
multiple displays and it even may not work fully correctly in that case,
but what is causing you problems?
What value are you using for DISPLAY?
Hello,
I tried to send this message last week, but there were problems with
my list subscription so I think it ended up in a black hole somewhere.
Has anyone ever addressed the issues raised in http://lists.gnu.org/
archive/html/gnustep-dev/2002-01/msg00013.html, regarding -NSHost
support
