Discussing is Ok, but what should we do in practice?

2000-02-28 Thread Albert Henderson
on 2/15/00 Antonella Pavese wrote: > I have been following the discussion of the September98 forum with > great interest for quite a while, and I am trying hard, as a young > scientist, to work in a way that can sustain your initiative. My > papers are on your Cogprint server. I discuss with my co

Re: Medical journals are dead. Long live medical journals

2000-02-28 Thread Albert Henderson
on Fri, 25 Feb 2000 Jim Till wrote: > My thanks to my colleague Peter Singer for his provocative article in > CMAJ, and for pointing me toward this forum. > > It's still far from clear (at least, to me!) why members of the physics > research community seem, in general, to be more comfortable wit

Re: Medical journals are dead. Long live medical journals

2000-02-28 Thread Marvin
- Original Message - From: Jim Till To: Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 2:57 PM Subject: Re: Medical journals are dead. Long live medical journals > My thanks to my colleague Peter Singer for his provocative article in > CMAJ, and for pointing me toward this forum. > > It's still far fr

Re: Medical journals are dead. Long live medical journals

2000-02-28 Thread Andrew Odlyzko
Jim Till writes: It's still far from clear (at least, to me!) why members of the physics research community seem, in general, to be more comfortable with eprints than are (as yet?) many members of the biomedical research community. That is an excellent question that has been puzzlin