Albert Henderson stated:
First, the transfer of copyright covers all copies
before and after. Copyright does not differ much
from the cake you cannot eat and then have.
Second, AGU et al. v. Texaco proved infringement all
the way to the U.S. Supreme
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Wentz, Reinhard wrote:
Since issuing the challenge I have thought of a definite limitation of
e-archiving: The list of references in e-archived articles will never look
as beautiful as the ones produced by publishers' professional proof readers,
copy editors and other
As noted in a few previous messages of mine, I'm interested in some of the
features of the Chemistry Preprint Server (CPS, see:
http://preprint.chemweb.com/). (But, I have no connection with CPS, and
I'm not a chemist).
Yesterday (on May 28) I browsed through the CPS archive. Of the
on 29 May 2001 Charles Oppenheim c.oppenh...@lboro.ac.uk claimed:
Albert Henderson stated:
First, the transfer of copyright covers all copies
before and after. Copyright does not differ much
from the cake you cannot eat and then have.
Second, AGU et al.
