Stevan Harnad wrote:
Do you think the APS estimate is a better average for the 20,000+
refereed journals and their 2,000,000+ annual articles? (I am not
asking ironically: I really wonder how representative you think the APS
bottom line is. We are talking about averages here, after all, and
About the likely factors, from the standpoint of a librarian:
Librarians will not cancel the conventional journals if they are used. They
will (at least if they are rational) cancel them when they show no use. It
is also of course likely that they will cancel them because of cost,
especially if
on 26 Jul 2001 Stevan Harnad har...@coglit.ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, George Lundberg wrote:
i certainly can agree with one point
the market will decide
howeveri would not count on any windfall savings unless there is a
secure on-going revenue stream
and that
on 26 Jul 2001 David Goodman dgood...@princeton.edu wrote:
About the likely factors, from the standpoint of a librarian:
Librarians will not cancel the conventional journals if they are used. They
will (at least if they are rational) cancel them when they show no use. It
is also of course
