I am afraid that the copyright discussion with Joseph Riolo is at
cross-purposes because we are systematically discussing different kinds
of texts, different kinds of authors, different kinds of purposes and
different kinds of problems.
The original question on this thread concerned whether the
At 12:35 06/11/01 +, Barry Mahon wrote:
Richard Poynder wrote:
I shall be interviewing Michael Mabe, Elsevier Science's Director of
Academic Relations, for a publication called Information Today
(www.infotoday.com) next week, and would welcome suggestions from any
users as to the kind
I find it very hard to believe that this is an accurate statement of US
law! It implies that, if I write a novel and then I choose to sell its
copyright absolutely to Stevan Harnad, he can then publish it, not just for
his financial benefit, but with Stevan Harnad as author! Surely not.
In
Richard -
thanks for the opportunity to comment via the September98 Forum list
My department's responsibility includes the library so we have thought about
it from both librarian and IT angles. I note also the comments from others
to date.
Our main qustions would concern:
(1) Business
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Fytton Rowland j.f.rowl...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
In European Union law the distinction is clear. Copyright, as the term
intellectual property implies, is a piece of property that can be bought
and sold; so if I sell the right to make copies of my novel to Stevan, he
can
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Stevan Harnad har...@cogprints.soton.ac.uk wrote:
I am afraid that the copyright discussion with Joseph Riolo is at
cross-purposes because we are systematically discussing different kinds
of texts, different kinds of authors, different kinds of purposes and
different kinds
hi richard ,
I haven't forgotten your email , although I'm immersed in a story about
terrorism. I've noticed that harnad's list is very active at the moment
discussing issues of copyright. I think that's the unresolved issue for me
. and what I think publishers like elsevier have to confront
