On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Professor S Della Sala wrote:
> I took over the editorship of Cortex from De Renzi a few months ago.
>
> Among the changes that I am implementing, after some struggles with the
> publisher: Cortex will now be accessible free for everybody with no
> delay on the net (http://www
Dear Stevan,
I took over the editorship of Cortex from De Renzi a few months ago.
Among the changes that I am implementing, after some struggles with the
publisher: Cortex will now be accessible free for everybody with no
delay on the net (http://www.cortex-online.org).
I am writing for two reas
Just one remark ...
the current system does waste a lot of reviewing work ... if only
because:
- the same paper gets submitted in several places, when not accepted
- papers are read by many people who never get to voice their
opinion, whether valuable or not.
There are many ways that revi
Arthur Smith wrote:
> In response to Stevan and Andrew, a question for all to consider...:
> Stevan Harnad wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Andrew Odlyzko wrote:
> > > [...] However, that does not preclude less expensive
> > > modes of operation, either with lower quality, or with shifting som
MODERATOR'S NOTE: Cloture has already been invoked on further postings
concerning the proposal that putting one's writing into the public
domain instead of asserting copyright is the solution to the problem
being addressed in this Forum. The problem being addressed in this
Forum is that of freeing
I hate to mention it, Eberhard, but I am not sure how many places
would want to keep most of them in print format. I am not even sure
whether most universities ought
Based on use data, print use of many titles -- including
many or most APS ones--in almost all science fields is very low for years
