Re: Responses to Walt Crawford's reflections on FOS

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Suber
In the October issue of _Cites & Insights_, Walt Crawford comments on several open-access initiatives, including SPARC's Create Change, PubSCIENCE, and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) and its FAQ. Here are some responses to his comments on the BOAI FAQ. Walt writes: >I'm not sure why t

Publishers and editors, was Garfield...

2002-10-07 Thread David Goodman
Belatedly checking the literature, I easily located printed documentation for your statements. I refer to Gillian Page et al., "Journal Publishing" CUP 1997, p.63 . I find this discussion most enlightening, as I personally and I believe many librarians have been assured otherwise by many publish

Re: Responses to Walt Crawford's reflections on FOS

2002-10-07 Thread Albert Henderson
on Mon, 7 Oct 2002 Peter Suber wrote: > In the October issue of _Cites & Insights_, Walt Crawford comments on > several open-access initiatives, including SPARC's Create Change, > PubSCIENCE, and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) and its > FAQ. Here are some responses to his comments on

Re: Responses to Walt Crawford's reflections on FOS

2002-10-07 Thread Jan Velterop
On the issue of spending and money it may be good to point out that even if exactly the same amount of money were to be spent on a reverse business model (pay for dissemination rather than for access) as is currently being spent on subscriptions and access licences in the conventional model, the be

Re: The True Cost of the Essentials (Implementing Peer Review)

2002-10-07 Thread Stevan Harnad
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Jan Velterop (BioMed Central) wrote: > On the issue of spending and money it may be good to point out that even > if exactly the same amount of money were to be spent on a reverse business > model (pay for dissemination rather than for access) as is currently > being spent on s