Re: UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) review

2002-11-27 Thread Stevan Harnad
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Jan Velterop wrote: > I meant to give an example of a complement to quantification. Signed open secondary reviews are certainly a complement to both scientometric measures and primary (peer) reviews. All direct human judgments are. But they are also countable, content-analyza

Re: UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) review

2002-11-27 Thread Jan Velterop
David, I'm not sure that 'accuracy' is a relevant notion in relation to Faculty of 1000. The faculty-members offer their opinions on papers they deem of interest. I quote from a response I sent earlier to one of Stevan Harnad's contributions to this list: The point of Faculty of 1000 is that an op

Re: UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) review

2002-11-27 Thread Sinisa Maricic
The outer (non-ISI) circle: Hope the [linked] review paper of mine is not (already) superfluous. The bottom line is, of course, (Stevan's) OAI. http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/archive/0087/ Sini_a Mari?i? HR-1 Zagreb, Polji?ka 12/D-419, Croatia smari...@rocketmail.com

Re: UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) review

2002-11-27 Thread informania
Tim, Thanks for the very interesting and suggestive data. At the risk of crossing threads, I wonder if this citation pattern is peculiar to physics or, even more narrowly, to arXiv? As arXiv grows to encompass more/all of physics, the volume of submissions should make the "inbox of research" appr

Re: UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) review

2002-11-27 Thread informania
Stevan, Thanks for the clarification of your definitions and position on impact measurements (in particular, for "The ISI journal-impact factor's vicious circularity is part of the toll-access circle, which is precisely what open-access and self-archiving are designed to free us from!"). I am glad

Re: UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) review

2002-11-27 Thread Jan Velterop
The semantic whip "what is scientometrics?" may lash, but doesn't quite crack, in my opinion. If Stevan says "I don't think that in reminding us [...], Jan is not giving us an alternative to scientometric quantification.", does that mean that he *does* think I *do*? Good. I didn't even mean to. I

The archival status of archived papers

2002-11-27 Thread Stevan Harnad
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Belinda Weaver wrote: > We've had complaints from archive contributors because they > cannot edit their papers once they have been deposited. If they > want to make a change, they have to clone their paper, edit the > clone and deposit that and then request removal of the ori