On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Tom Abeles wrote:
Harnad's observation is interesting if the prime reason for publishing
were to share with colleagues. Unfortunately this ideal gets distorted by
the myriad of reasons to publish or even not to publish, regardless of the
disciplines. And, as an aside, the
Hi Steve
I think we are in agreement here.
Perhaps one of the issues is that the open archives concept also
exposes all of these millions of refereed articles to the public at
large. Academics might find that the Sokal Affair was benign compared
to a potential fire storm in a time of shrinking
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Tom Abeles wrote:
Perhaps one of the issues is that the open archives concept also
exposes all of these millions of refereed articles to the public at
large. Academics might find that the Sokal Affair was benign compared
to a potential fire storm in a time of shrinking
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, H.M. Gladney wrote:
http://lists.openlib.org/pipermail/oai-eprints/2003-February/38.html
sh It has nothing -- repeat, nothing -- to do with either publishers
sh or economists: It is purely between the research community and itself.
Harnad seems to take a narrow and
