Le 1 Mars 2003 15:16, David Goodman a =E9crit :
> Jean-Claude may feel that
>
> > > Librarians create the illusion of free access by supporting the whole
> > > structure financially
>
> and Stevan may disdain
>
> > Anyone who prefers instead to fight with publishers over tolls -- or to
> > lock ho
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Arthur P. Smith wrote:
> [By the way, Stevan changed my Subject line - but I suppose it's a
> relevant followup]
The Forum has been continuous since 1998. To make the archive more useful
to users, I gather new postings under relevant existing threads, if
they exist, rather tha
[By the way, Stevan changed my Subject line - but I suppose it's a
relevant followup]
Stevan Harnad wrote:
I would say there is no particular lesson to be learnt from such cases,
precisely because they are rare, and no one cares.
How do we know how rare they are? The problem I see with this,
The case below is reminiscent of the Bogdanov affair, discussed in this
Forum in the following threads:
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2365.html
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2370.html
I would say there is no particular lesson to be learnt from such cases,
Some of you may be interested in the following "slashdot" discussion
from a day or two ago:
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/03/1224243&mode=thread&tid=93&tid=134&tid=146
titled "Riemann Hypothesis Proved?" quoting a Swedish newspaper
(apparently the major print news outlet in Swe
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Steve Hitchcock wrote:
> ... in many cases for authors to reserve a self-archiving right, rather
> than copyright, is sufficient, but not in every case... One example is
> where you might want to [1] reuse data in more than one paper. [T]here are
> cases where research results
I agree with Elizabeth that it is clearly beneficial for authors to retain
copyright, and I'm not sure why we are not actively formulating a strategy
to help and encourage more authors to do this.
Stevan may be right that in many cases for authors to reserve a
self-archiving right, rather than co
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Pam Davies wrote:
> But in the context of learning and teaching there are indeed possible
> uses that the author might want which are "not provided by permanent
> full-text open-access on the web:"
In the growing momentum toward open-access to refereed research a number
of sti
Stevan says, in reply to Lizzie Gadd:
> From: Stevan Harnad [mailto:har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
> Sent: 03 March 2003 11:47
> What would be a very useful exercise for those who believe that having a
> full-text permenantly accessible to every web-user on the planet 24
> hours a day does *not* provide
