Re: Open Letter to Philip Campbell, Editor, Nature

2003-10-29 Thread Chris Korycinski
On 28 Oct 2003 at 17:02, Peter Suber wrote: This elaboration can easily be read to include the author's directory within an institutional repository. but the next faq from Nature says that 'you may not distribute the PDF... on open archives'. So presumably you can still keep _your_ version

Re: Distinguishing the Essentials from the Optional Add-Ons

2003-10-29 Thread Stevan Harnad
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Chris Korycinski wrote: Re: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3115.html http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/att-3115/01-0Licence.PDF the next faq from Nature says that 'you may not distribute the PDF... on open archives'. So presumably you

Re: Open Letter to Philip Campbell, Editor, Nature

2003-10-29 Thread Peter Suber
At 09:48 AM 10/29/2003 +, you wrote: On 28 Oct 2003 at 17:02, Peter Suber wrote: This elaboration can easily be read to include the author's directory within an institutional repository. but the next faq from Nature says that 'you may not distribute the PDF... on open archives'. So