on 2/6/2004 Jean-Claude Guédon wrote:
I believe Stevan has said most of what is needed to answer your message.
For my part, I will focus on OA journals and would like to underscore the fact
that this particular way to move to open access will require some
concertation among a variety of
In response to Albert Henderson, let me stress the following points:
1. The trend I was referring to was the growing support of a growing number of
various granting agencies for financial support for the OA business plan as
exemplified by BioMed Central and by PLos;
2. If we look at the
We are pleased to announce the programme for the meeting
National Policies on Open Access (OA) Provision for University Research Output
http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19prog.html
Jean-Claude Guedon wrote:
3. The OA [journal] movement may be commercial, but it does not have to be.
Comparing it to a dot.com is inaccurate at best;
Can you please tell us why?
4. If there is one way to increase scientific productivity, it is with open
access. Impact figures that begin to
I will not be replying further to A. Henderson or A.R. Suhail on the
Author Publication Charge Debate, for two reasons:
(1) Direct spokesmen for PLoS, BMC, and the Developing World are
better qualified to reply.
(2) The flavor of OA to which I am devoting most of my own energy
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Jean-Claude Guédon wrote [in part]:
[j-cg] 2. If we look at the growing number of open access
[j-cg] journals and the growing number of open access
[j-cg] repositories, including OAI compliant personal
[j-cg] pages, and if we look at OA harvesters, I would say
[j-cg] that
Dear all,
There has been some discussion earlier about the estimated cost for
institutional archives. We will give a summary of how we have approched
the task of setting up an institutional archive, some of our experiences
and costs related to that work.We also hope this might stimulate others
I believe that paid-for secondary services like Chemical Abstracts *will*
have a place in the new world of OA. I am not convinced that give-away
software from OAI or wherever will do the whole job of search and navigation
through the literature. However, Stevan has always said that his arguments
on Tue, 10 Feb 2004 Jean-Claude =?iso-8859-1?q?Gu=E9don?=
jean.claude.gue...@umontreal.ca wrote:
In response to Albert Henderson, let me stress the following points:
1. The trend I was referring to was the growing support of a growing number of
various granting agencies for financial support
Eriksson Jörgen writes
We are very interested in getting in touch with other institutional
archives to share experiences on ways of implementing an
institutional archive. Please send comments and your experiences
either to the list or directly to us.
There is a special mailing list for
Fytton Rowland writes
I believe that paid-for secondary services like Chemical Abstracts
*will* have a place in the new world of OA.
Some may have, others won't have. Building collections of secondary
data is what the OAI-PMH protocol is all about. If the full-text
is free, it is more
Jim Till wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Jean-Claude Guédon wrote [in part]:
[j-cg] the growing number of open access repositories
[j-cg] including OAI compliant personal pages
I noted with interest Jean-Claude's comment about OAI
compliant personal pages. How can such pages be identified
as
on Tue, 10 Feb 2004 Stevan Harnad har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
[snip]
It does seem ironic, though, that a spokesman on behalf of the
developing world (ARS) should be making common cause with a publicist for
toll-access publishers (AH) who has long argued that the solution to the
serials
See comments below:
Le 10 Février 2004 11:17, Albert Henderson a écrit :
on Tue, 10 Feb 2004 Jean-Claude =?iso-8859-1?q?Gu=E9don?=
jean.claude.gue...@umontreal.ca wrote:
In response to Albert Henderson, let me stress the following points:
1. The trend I was referring to was the growing
14 matches
Mail list logo
