Hi Stevan,
I just tried to post a message to the list. I have closely been following
your work over the past several months and find it fascinating. I'd love to
hear your thoughts on how Yahoo! can potentially help in encouraging
open-access.
I work in the Yahoo! Search group and one of our
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Hamaker, Chuck wrote:
I'd like to use this post as a handout on e-journals for a session of a
statewide conference for faculty from the University of North Carolina
systems. Will you grant that permission?
Chuck,
All materials on the American Scientist Open Access Forum
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Sumir Meghani wrote:
I'd love to hear your thoughts on how Yahoo! can potentially help in
encouraging open-access.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040302/25391_1.html
The Open Access (OA) movement is focussed specifically on articles in
peer-reviewed journals. Most OA content is
Sally Morris chief-e...@alpsp.org wrote:
Curiously, there seems to be remarkably little evidence of author demand
for Open Access publication according to all the studies I have seen.
Well, there's remarkably little evidence only if one ignores the
fact that authors have been and are
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, [identity deleted] wrote:
Dear Stevan,
I have a graduate (master's) student who wishes to do her dissertation about
pricing policies in electronic publishing. It would be helpful to her to be
able to access the American Scientist Open Access Forum - I'm not sure if it
[Forwarding from SciDev.Net. --Peter.]
The Science and Development Network (SciDev.Net) is pleased to announce its
new quick guide on science publishing (www.scidev.net/scipub).
Concentrating on the issue of how developing-country scientists can access
the latest scientific research, the
on 3/7/04 4:52 AM, Stevan Harnad at har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Central versus institutional self-archiving
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3208.html
Depositing articles -- by authors who are immediately ready to deposit
them today -- into existing Central Archives
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Leslie Chan wrote:
most archives are non-existent or near-empty. So filling the existing
archives, whether central or not, should be the priority...
where the articles sit really doesn't matter.
Agreed!
Institutions will or will not set up archives based on their own
