Subject Thread:
"Scientometric OAI Search Engines"
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2237.html
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Michael Leach wrote:
> As we build institutional repositories (IR) and begin the process of
> linking these repositories, we could have the ability to c
On 26-May-04, at 1:56 PM, David Goodman wrote:
Is it the library that is responsible for the cost of self-archiving?
Is it the library that runs the server, or pays for the Internet
connection? Is it the library that does the proofreading, or scans
the photographs?
Many libraries do have respo
At 01:45 27/05/04 +0100, Heather Morrison wrote:
An institutional repository is merely a new form of collection of
information.
Not *merely* a collection, it is much more than that. Evidence from ArXiv
shows that open access archives become a focus for intense social activity
and interaction
h
Dear Steven Harnad,
I have always found your opinions regarding open access extremely
logical and wise, and much of my own reasoning was greatly influenced
by your writings.
But things I have read in the American Scientist Open Access Forum
these days forced me to leave my position of silent witn
Iva Melinscak Zlodi makes a valid and poignant plea on behalf of both the
motivations and the contributions of librarians -- both in the struggle to
maximize journal affordability (for the sake of their researcher/users)
and the struggle to maximize researcher access to journal articles. The
two ar
Elsevier has just gone from being a Romeo "Pale-Green" publisher to a full
Romeo Green publisher: Authors have the publisher's official green light to
self-archive both their pre-refereeing preprints and their refereed
postprints.
Elsevier has thereby demonstrated that -- whatever its pricing poli
