On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Thomas Krichel wrote:
> Stevan Harnad writes
> > SH: (7) University-external, subject-based self-archiving does not
> > scale up to cover all of OA output space: it is divergent,
> > divisive, arbitrary, incoherent and unnecessary.
>
> TK: So, do you recommend arXiv, RePE
On 20 Mar 2008, at 02:18, Thomas Krichel wrote:
> Stevan Harnad writes
>
> > (7) University-external, subject-based self-archiving does not
> > scale up
> > to cover all of OA output space: it is divergent, divisive,
> > arbitrary,
> > incoherent and unnecessary.
>
> So, do you reccommend arXi
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Ann Okerson wrote:
> Right now we have a kind of mess that needs time to sort out: trying to
> achieve compliance for literally thousands of authors and articles in a
> couple of months (since the mandate was announced in January) is a
> herculean
> task, when the institutiona
Stevan Harnad writes
> (7) University-external, subject-based self-archiving does not scale up
> to cover all of OA output space: it is divergent, divisive, arbitrary,
> incoherent and unnecessary.
So, do you reccommend arXiv, RePEc, E-LIS, etc to close down?
Disclosure: I am the creator o
