The OA impact bibliography has a section on Web tools for measuring impact
http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html#tools
Yes, there are citation search and impact services for OA archives
and IRs, but none that are both focussed exclusively on such
repositories and (probably)
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Talat Chaudhri [tac] wrote:
Gold OA [1] isn't popular and, I suspect, [2] never will be.
You are right about the first point [1], and the reason is partly
the current price of Gold OA and partly the fact that Gold OA is not
yet necessary, because Green OA (self-archiving)
[from E-LIS editors' list]
--- Tomas Baiget bai...@sarenet.es wrote:
From: Tomas Baiget bai...@sarenet.es
To: E-LIS editors list elis-edit...@lists.openlib.org
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 13:56:41 +0200
Subject: [Elis-editors] Jacsó writes about E-LIS
Péter Jacsó, University of Hawaii,
All,
The argument made by Stevan Harnad in the post below is marred by the
repeated assertion that all authors want OA1 (his term, i.e. what
we have hitherto been asked to call Green OA self-archiving). The
experience of a repository manager quickly shows that many academics
do not want it,
