Dear Klaus
I don't believe you are an idiot, but if you want to be taken seriously you
must give the data to support your arguments. It was really interesting to
see, for example, that the two papers you received were from our top 1% of
researchers (Professors Large and Canty). Large h-index 12, 6
[ The following text is in the "utf-8" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
Hi Mike, seems like it might be a germanism:
aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Rabulistik (von lateinisch r
Klaus
I find your conclusions regarding the "Request Button" unproven.
· Firstly, it is obvious that the button "works" in the case
of the University of Tasmania. You got two papers, so the software
works.
· Secondly the sample was ridiculously small.
· Thirdly, y
On 22 Nov 2008, at 06:43, Arthur Sale wrote:
> Obviously we in Tasmania need to do more work to
> educate our depositors to respond to 'reprint' requests, and we will.
Perhaps the actions of The Button could be discretely managed, so that
the library / repository manager could monitor the success
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Michael Eisen
wrote:
Is rabulistic a word?
(1)
From OED for "rabulous"
As befits the rabble or vulgar element of the populace,
scurrilous; vulgar; base.
In quot. 1654: of or belonging to the rabble
(see RABBLE ROUT n. 2).
2008/11/22 Arthur Sale :
> Klaus
>
>
>
> I find your conclusions regarding the "Request Button" unproven.
>
>
>
> · Firstly, it is obvious that the button "works" in the case of the
> University of Tasmania. You got two papers, so the software works.
That was'nt the point. Like Professor
