[ The following text is in the UTF-8 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
Charles
You miss the point. As the copy leaves my Australian hands, it is not
an infringing copy. It falls under an
[ The following text is in the utf-8 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
Was ever thus, Arthur. If I make copies of a document in a country with no
copyright laws at all, and attempt to bring
Arthur
You seem to be using an out-of-date copy of the UK Act. The text you
quote is the original 1988 version. Important changes were made in
2003. It has some implications for what you say, obviously in
discussing legal issues it's best to use an up-to-date version of the
legal provisions
On 4-Aug-09, at 6:45 AM, S. Harnad wrote:
Aside: This formal side-issue has next to nothing to do with Open
Access and Green Open
Access Mandates.
As interesting as may be these discussions about the subtleties of
copyright law and its application to scholarly activities (and I,
Stevan -
many thanks for a succinct summary. However, while I agree it has
nothing to do strictly with green OA, the subject of copyright has
been used by some disingenuously to try to dissuade authors from
self-archiving of peer-reviewed material as you well know. Debunking
the myth could prove
[ The following text is in the utf-8 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
In the last few years, various attempts to estimate the number of
journals in the world have been used. Figures ranging
