Dekker's speech was remarkable for being clear and concise. It is a long time
since someone made the case so well.
Chris
Von Samsung Mobile gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Jeroen Bosman
Datum:28.01.2014 23:29 (GMT+01:00)
An: goal@eprints.org
Betreff: [GOAL] Speech by
Same inkling as Jan Laurent. The way fwd for OAP would be some form of
accreditation by repository publisher. One would need to show what review
quality assurance mechanism is used, e.g. Pre- Post- Open peer review and
demonstrate annually to the accreditation agency that this is what you
...@ecs.soton.ac.ukmailto:har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk:
On 2013-11-27, at 12:47 PM, Armbruster, Chris
chris.armbrus...@eui.eumailto:chris.armbrus...@eui.eu wrote:
What puzzles me is that quite a number of OA veterans and advocates keep
moaning about the UK OA policy. In your case, Fred, I am intrigued
coordination) as well as opportunity costs (e.g. IPR regime maintained, re-use
very limited).
Chris
Am 27.11.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Stevan Harnad
har...@ecs.soton.ac.ukmailto:har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk:
On 2013-11-27, at 12:47 PM, Armbruster, Chris
chris.armbrus...@eui.eumailto:chris.armbrus...@eui.eu wrote
What puzzles me is that quite a number of OA veterans and advocates keep
moaning about the UK OA policy. In your case, Fred, I am intrigued by the
assertion that
The Finch saga has done nothing to change the IPR regime through which
publishers control the infrastructure, nor is the process
Hélène,
Institution is indeed not a very precise concept, but the repository ranking
will not be improved if one were to spend much time trying to decide which
repository is institutional and which is not (e.g. how about also deleting No 10
because it is only a departmental repository?). Also,
Stevan Harnard wrote:
Yet the resolution is a simple one-liner: All research institutions
and funders worldwide need to mandate institutional deposit, and then
reap the harvest centrally, with search services, subject
collections,
national collections, language collections, and any other ideal
, with
a large variety of items. In Australia, institutional repositories
are prominently tied to the national research assessment exercise,
with due emphasis on peer reviewed publications.
More here:
Armbruster, Chris and Romary, Laurent, Comparing Repository Types:
Challenges and Barriers for Subject-Based
(or
regional) system.
Armbruster, Chris and Romary, Laurent, Comparing Repository Types:
Challenges and Barriers for Subject-Based Repositories, Research
Repositories, National Repository Systems and Institutional
Repositories in Serving Scholarly Communication (November 23, 2009).
Available at SSRN
you to respond to. We imagine that this new
four-fold distinction would help repository managers and stakeholders
in improving repository services in a targetted manner. Please answer
to the list (or, if you prefer, write to me directly).
- Armbruster, Chris and Romary, Laurent, Comparing
Dear colleagues,
PEER is a pioneering collaboration between publishers, repositories and the
research community, by which at least 16,000 peer reviewed manuscripts destined
to become journal articles in ISI ranked journals will be made available for
archiving every year for three years. The
I have a few ideas about this, based on experience in social science
departments at UK universities:
- Some years ago ACLS was able to insert itself into the routine and
large-scale copying that goes on in higher education teaching;
- The amounts of text being photocopied are likely to be
at the repositories ranking:
http://repositories.webometrics.info/
More is available from this 2008 paper:
Armbruster, Chris,Access, Usage and Citation Metrics: What Function for Digital
Libraries and Repositories in Research Evaluation?
Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1088453
Chris
and reliability of many
measures, technical faults as well as the misguided judgements of peers,
university management, funding agencies and government.
My own contribution (working paper) may be found with SSRN: Armbruster,
Chris, Access, Usage and Citation Metrics: What Function for Digital
Libraries
Deear colleagues,
Please find below a summary list of 2008 publications, that have achieved
special recognition in being selected for a special issue of Policy Futures in
Education. This includes
- an argument about the correspondence of innovative moves in the natural and
social sciences
law programme with an
increasing number of journals. There is potential in this model for emulation
and adaptation across research communities.
The following working paper sets out the examples:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1106162
Suggested Citation
Armbruster, Chris
from the University Of California [August 2007]
http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/responses/activities.html
My criticism of the CSHE report is included in the follwing paper:
Armbruster, Chris, Society Publishing, the Internet and Open Access: Shifting
Mission-Orientation from Content Holding
17 matches
Mail list logo
