nity
> are generated and refined and rendered rationally persuasive chiefly in
> informal circumstances, and the primary publication in which they eventuate,
> though essential in the process, actually plays a relatively minor role in
&g
in
informal circumstances, and the primary publication in which they eventuate,
though essential in the process, actually plays a relatively minor role in
acceptance. But the need for summary overviews of informal discourse, from
the standpoint of a non-participant observer, is nevertheless dubious for
reasons given above.
Joseph Ransdell
Dept of Philosophy
Texas Tech University
ransd...@door.net
, the point is to be able to
advise people, with confidence, that this is legally okay.
Joseph Ransdell
ransd...@door.net
Professor Emeritus
Dept of Philosophy
Texas Tech University
Lubbock TX 79409
a third-party website
listing of
papers by title and URL, where the paper is archived in accordance with the
permission specified in the quoted passage above?
2nd Question: What about the case where there is no such special permission
mentioned in the copyright transference? Is there any legal prob
couraging self-archiving for that reason. That is, it should be
conceived in such a way that on-line communication less rigorous than
that associated with primary publication is encouraged as well. This
need not be thought of as in opposition to Stevan's project
--
~~~
From: "ransdell, joseph m."
Thanks, Steven, for your reply, and you have my permission to put the
nested exchange below in the public record. As before, I have not
forgotten that it is the refereed journal literature which is at issue
here.
Josep
Joseph Ransdell :
I posted the [indented] message below to the Colloquy at the Chronicle of
Higher Education.
http://www.chronicle.com/free/v45/i04/04a02901.htm
There seems to be some misunderstanding on this matter somewhere, and
perhaps you know about Koonin's initiative apart fro
