Thanks to Xenia van Edig (of Copernicus) and Dirk Pieper for providing new
substantive evidence. Following are highlights of my update. New blog post
title: Copernicus 2015-2016 comparison
Update July 6, 2016:
I retract my statement on tripling of page charges thanks to new evidence
indicatin
Message-
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Heather Morrison
Sent: 06 Jul 2016 15:21
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Copernicus pricing: retraction of assessment of price tripling,
re-affirming assessment of market vo
rtin Rasmussen
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
> Heather Morrison
> Sent: 06 Jul 2016 15:21
> To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
>
016 1:07 PM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: Re: [GOAL] Copernicus pricing: retraction of assessment of price
tripling, re-affirming assessment of market volatility
thanks Silke.
I have updated the post again - highlights that may interest list members:
Data change
bal Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)"
Subject: Re: [GOAL] Copernicus pricing: retraction of assessment of price
tripling, re-affirming assessment of market volatility
One additional thought ... I think it is a little disingenuous to talk about %
increases in journal prices, if the actual amo
