I agree with what Bjoern and Mark have said. We have the imperative to
develop a new set of tools and most is in place.
For my part I am launching "the Content Mine" over these current days. The
goal is simple - to extract 100,000,000 million facts from the scholarly
scientific literature. See
ht
On Saturday, November 30, 2013, 12:30:54 AM, you wrote:
> The technology to do all of this already exists. Most of
> the STEM metadata you describe is actually directly
> available in Medline, and the core parts can be used as
> per the open biblio principles. Crawling the websites is
> already po
The technology to do all of this already exists. Most of the STEM metadata
you describe is actually directly available in Medline, and the core parts
can be used as per the open biblio principles. Crawling the websites is
already possible using pubcrawler and other tools, and finding out what
their
Thanks Daniel for chiming in, this was really helpful. I hope you don't mind a
few more comments/questions?
On Friday, November 29, 2013, 4:27:38 PM, you wrote:
> (a) finding a publication on a site other than the publisher's does
> not necessarily mean that file is legally there, or even that i
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Bjoern Brembs wrote:
> On Friday, November 22, 2013, 5:28:12 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
>> What's OA is OA, and harvesters, including PMC, will find them.
>
> That's what I want to do - on a global scale.
That would be nice indeed, but the problem is that
(a) finding
On Friday, November 22, 2013, 5:28:12 PM, you wrote:
>>> SH: Institutional users need access to subscription journals today… if the
>>> content is not OA, it means paying tolls.
>> BB: Is that supposed to be a justification for keeping subscriptions?
> Yes, till the must-have articles are acces
November 2013 10:26 AM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Cc: scholc...@ala.org; open-acc...@lists.okfn.org
Subject: [GOAL] Re: [Open-access] Re: Re: Fight Publishing Lobby's Latest
"FIRST" Act to Delay OA - Nth Successor to PRISM, RWA etc.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Bj
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Bjoern Brembs wrote:
> *SH:* Institutional users need access to subscription journals today… if
> the content is not OA, it means paying tolls.
> *BB:* Is that supposed to be a justification for keeping subscriptions?
Yes, till the must-have articles are ac
On Friday, November 22, 2013, 12:25:42 AM, you wrote:
>> I find subscriptions too expensive compared to other
>> solutions
> Institutional users need access to subscription journals
> today. Whatever the solution, if the content is not OA, it
> means paying tolls. The toll budget for journal acce
; *Cc:* scholc...@ala.org; open-acc...@lists.okfn.org
> *Subject:* [GOAL] Re: [Open-access] Re: Re: Fight Publishing Lobby's
> Latest "FIRST" Act to Delay OA - Nth Successor to PRISM, RWA etc.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Bjoern Brembs
> wro
lobal Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Cc: scholc...@ala.org; open-acc...@lists.okfn.org
Subject: [GOAL] Re: [Open-access] Re: Re: Fight Publishing Lobby's Latest
"FIRST" Act to Delay OA - Nth Successor to PRISM, RWA etc.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Bjoern Brembs wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Bjoern Brembs wrote:
I find subscriptions too expensive compared to other solutions
>
Institutional users need access to subscription journals today. Whatever
the solution, if the content is not OA, it means paying tolls. The toll
budget for journal access is ha
On Monday, November 18, 2013, 6:06:21 PM, you wrote:
> But as for librarians getting out of the business of
> subscribing to journals -- that's just ideology (and
> completely unrealistic) as long as authors don't into the
> business of self-archiving their published articles in
> their institutio
13 matches
Mail list logo
