On Saturday, November 30, 2013, 12:30:54 AM, you wrote:
The technology to do all of this already exists. Most of
the STEM metadata you describe is actually directly
available in Medline, and the core parts can be used as
per the open biblio principles. Crawling the websites is
already
I agree with what Bjoern and Mark have said. We have the imperative to
develop a new set of tools and most is in place.
For my part I am launching the Content Mine over these current days. The
goal is simple - to extract 100,000,000 million facts from the scholarly
scientific literature. See
On Friday, November 22, 2013, 5:28:12 PM, you wrote:
SH: Institutional users need access to subscription journals today… if the
content is not OA, it means paying tolls.
BB: Is that supposed to be a justification for keeping subscriptions?
Yes, till the must-have articles are accessible
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Bjoern Brembs b.bre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, November 22, 2013, 5:28:12 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
What's OA is OA, and harvesters, including PMC, will find them.
That's what I want to do - on a global scale.
That would be nice indeed, but the problem is
Thanks Daniel for chiming in, this was really helpful. I hope you don't mind a
few more comments/questions?
On Friday, November 29, 2013, 4:27:38 PM, you wrote:
(a) finding a publication on a site other than the publisher's does
not necessarily mean that file is legally there, or even that
The technology to do all of this already exists. Most of the STEM metadata
you describe is actually directly available in Medline, and the core parts
can be used as per the open biblio principles. Crawling the websites is
already possible using pubcrawler and other tools, and finding out what
:* [GOAL] Re: [Open-access] Re: Re: Fight Publishing Lobby's
Latest FIRST Act to Delay OA - Nth Successor to PRISM, RWA etc.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Bjoern Brembs b.bre...@gmail.com
wrote:
*[Arthur] *…
I would expand green mandates to cover not only text, but also data
On Friday, November 22, 2013, 12:25:42 AM, you wrote:
I find subscriptions too expensive compared to other
solutions
Institutional users need access to subscription journals
today. Whatever the solution, if the content is not OA, it
means paying tolls. The toll budget for journal access is
List (Successor of AmSci)
Cc: scholc...@ala.org; open-acc...@lists.okfn.org
Subject: [GOAL] Re: [Open-access] Re: Re: Fight Publishing Lobby's Latest
FIRST Act to Delay OA - Nth Successor to PRISM, RWA etc.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Bjoern Brembs b.bre...@gmail.com wrote:
[Arthur
On Monday, November 18, 2013, 6:06:21 PM, you wrote:
But as for librarians getting out of the business of
subscribing to journals -- that's just ideology (and
completely unrealistic) as long as authors don't into the
business of self-archiving their published articles in
their institutional
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Bjoern Brembs b.bre...@gmail.com wrote:
I find subscriptions too expensive compared to other solutions
Institutional users need access to subscription journals today. Whatever
the solution, if the content is not OA, it means paying tolls. The toll
budget for
Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Cc: scholc...@ala.org; open-acc...@lists.okfn.org
Subject: [GOAL] Re: [Open-access] Re: Re: Fight Publishing Lobby's Latest
FIRST Act to Delay OA - Nth Successor to PRISM, RWA etc.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Bjoern Brembs b.bre...@gmail.com wrote
12 matches
Mail list logo
