> Since -- exactly like Springer's (hedge-free) rights-retention policy (and
> countless others) -- Elsevier's policy does indeed formally recognize right
> of the authors of the articles published in 2000 Elsevier journals to make
> them immediately OA (unembargoed), I would say that the "angel
On 2013-05-03, at 2:57 AM, David Prosser wrote:
> I agree with Andras and I cannot see how any publisher who has a policy along
> the lines of:
>
> You may make your author version freely available without embargo unless you
> are mandated (by funder or institution) to do so, in which case you
On 2013-05-02, at 4:28 AM, Fotis Georgatos wrote:
> On May 2, 2013, at 9:17 AM, Andras Holl wrote:
>> Regardless however right you are, Elsevier's play with words succesfully
>> confuses
>> a large number of authors, who do not deposit because of this.
>
> It is the role of research institute
On 2013-05-02, at 3:17 AM, Andras Holl wrote:
> Dear Stevan,
>
> Regardless however right you are, Elsevier's play with words succesfully
> confuses
> a large number of authors, who do not deposit because of this.
Dear Andras,
You are quite right. But word-play is word-play, and the only w
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:10 PM, BISSET J. wrote:
> From our understanding of Elsevier policy this is not the case in two
> instances:
>
> 1) if the institution requires deposit in their institutional repository
> 2) if the funder requires open access.
>
Dear James,
Elsevier rights agreements
