Richard Poynder's detailed overview of the current UK state of play in OA in the rich preamble to this interview is even more interesting and informative than the interview itself, although the interview too is very timely and useful.
Stevan Harnad On 2012-09-17, at 7:39 AM, Richard Poynder wrote: > Founded in 1997, Hindawi Publishing Corporation was the first subscription > publisher to convert its entire portfolio of journals to Open Access (OA). > This has enabled the company to grow very rapidly and today it publishes over > 400 OA journals. > > The speed of Hindawi’s growth, which included creating many new journals in a > short space of time and mass mailing researchers, led to suspicion that it > was a “predatory” organisation. Today, however, most of its detractors have > been won round and — bar the occasional hiccup — Hindawi is viewed as a > respectable and responsible publisher. > > Nevertheless, Hindawi’s story poses a number of questions. First, how do > researchers distinguish between good and bad publishers in today’s > Internet-fuelled publishing revolution, and what constitutes acceptable > practice anyway? Second, does today’s Western-centric publishing culture tend > to discriminate against publishers based in the developing world? Third, > might the author-side payment model fast becoming the norm in OA publishing > turn out to be flawed? Finally, can we expect OA publishing to prove less > expensive than subscription publishing? If not, what are the implications? > > These at least were some of the questions that occurred to me during my > interview with Ahmed Hindawi. > > The interview can be read here: > http://poynder.blogspot.fi/2012/09/the-oa-interviews-ahmed-hindawi-founder..html > > _______________________________________________ > GOAL mailing list > GOAL@eprints.org > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list GOAL@eprints.org http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
