On 2012-04-26, at 5:09 PM, LIBLICENSE wrote:
> From: Michael Carroll
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:12:56 -0400
>
> Hi all,
>
>The interesting choice here is NIH's focus on the researcher when
> the grantee is the institution. In the grant agreement, the
> institution makes the promise to NIH
On 2012-04-26, at 5:09 PM, LIBLICENSE wrote:
> From: Michael Carroll
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:12:56 -0400
>
> Hi all,
>
>The interesting choice here is NIH's focus on the researcher when
> the grantee is the institution. In the grant agreement, the
> institution makes the promise to NIH
> From: "Wise, Alicia (ELS-OXF)"
>
> I suspect compliance enforcement may not be such an issue for NIH
> because so many publishers deposit on behalf of their authors. It's
> one of the ways publishers have constructively engaged with the NIH on
> implementation of its open access policy. Elsev
> From: "Wise, Alicia (ELS-OXF)"
>
> I suspect compliance enforcement may not be such an issue for NIH
> because so many publishers deposit on behalf of their authors. It's
> one of the ways publishers have constructively engaged with the NIH on
> implementation of its open access policy. Elsev
ripts into PMC on behalf of authors since 2005, for example.
With kind wishes,
Alicia
From: goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Eisen
Sent: 25 April 2012 15:49
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: OA and NIH pub
The NIH enforces the policy by requiring a PMC ID on every paper submitted with
grant progress reports and renewals. It's actually fairly effective.Â
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Hard to imagine how fundee compliance with NIH OA policy can be
effectively enfo
The NIH enforces the policy by requiring a PMC ID on every paper submitted
with grant progress reports and renewals. It's actually fairly effective.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
> Hard to imagine how fundee compliance with NIH OA policy can be
> effectively enforced while
Hard to imagine how fundee compliance with NIH OA policy can be
effectively enforced while:
(1) Deposit can be done by either the fundee or the publisher
(who is not bound by the grant's conditions)
(2) Deposit must by directly in PubMed Central instead
of the fundee's institutional repository (w
Hard to imagine how fundee compliance with NIH OA policy can be
effectively enforced while:
(1) Deposit can be done by either the fundee or the publisher
(who is not bound by the grant's conditions)
(2) Deposit must by directly in PubMed Central instead
of the fundee's institutional repository (w
