[GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to mandating Green OA self-archiving

2013-01-20 Thread Stevan Harnad
> 1. Mandatory Green OA self-archiving in Stevan's meaning is fine > for the disciplines to which it applies; It applies to (the refereed journal articles of) *all* disciplines: No exceptions. > 2. Other tactics are also fine, in particular some flavours of Gold > (OA journal publishing), and ag

[GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to mandating Green OA self-archiving

2013-01-20 Thread Jean-Claude Guédon
Le dimanche 20 janvier 2013 à 16:52 -0500, Stevan Harnad a écrit : > > 1. Mandatory Green OA self-archiving in Stevan's meaning is fine > > for the disciplines to which it applies; > > It applies to (the refereed journal articles of) *all* disciplines: No > exceptions. Indeed, but in a number

[GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to mandating Green OA self-archiving

2013-01-20 Thread Heather Morrison
On 20-Jan-13, at 2:25 PM, Jean-Claude Guédon wrote: (excerpt) Some forms of Gold do not require any more payment than what is needed to maintain a repository. In fact, an OA Gold journal is a repository of its own articles. Comment: a gold OA journal serves as a repository, however it is im

[GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to mandating Green OA self-archiving

2013-01-20 Thread Arthur Sale
- From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of Heather Morrison Sent: Monday, 21 January 2013 10:11 AM To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) Subject: [GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to mandating Green OA self-archiving On 20-Jan

[GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to mandating Green OA self-archiving

2013-01-20 Thread Jean-Claude Guédon
Good point about the instability of journals, Heather, but the same instability applies to repositories. The CIHR policy change in Canada, that you recently pointed out, extending the embargo to 12 months, is a case in point. The rules under which one may archiver are at the discretion of publisher

[GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to mandating Green OA self-archiving

2013-01-21 Thread Jean-Claude Guédon
org] On Behalf > Of Heather Morrison > Sent: Monday, 21 January 2013 10:11 AM > To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) > Subject: [GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to > mandating Green OA self-archiving > > On 20-Jan-13, at 2:25 PM, Jean-Claude

[GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to mandating Green OA self-archiving

2013-01-21 Thread Heather Morrison
smania, Australia >> >> -Original Message- >> From: >> goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org >> ] On Behalf >> Of Heather Morrison >> Sent: Monday, 21 January 2013 10:11 AM >> To: Global Open Access List (Successor of Am

[GOAL] Re: Please distinguish what is and is not relevant to mandating Green OA self-archiving

2013-01-21 Thread Hans Pfeiffenberger
ss stuff, important though >>> it is. >>> >>> Of course, to forestall comment by someone who wants to carp, the lifetime >>> of research outputs does vary. In some disciplines it is of the order of a >>> year or two on average, in others perhaps of centuri