In this
>> > particular case, I do not see how going first for gratis, and then for
>> > libre, would impede the goal of ultimately reaching libre."
>> >
>> > I believe that what I wrote is not ambiguous or difficult to understand.
>> >
>> > O
Hello,
As far as I understand english, it seems that
Jean-Claude says exactly the contrary :
Having gratis access is a first goal that
doesn't impede having free (re-utilisable)
acces after.
For one time Jean-Claude strategically agree
Jean-Claude,
Does this mean that you think trying for ideal OA and settling for Gratis
Ocular Access where ideal OA is not yet possible, is acting against the ideal
goal? If so, on what basis?
Best,
Jan
On 10 Oct 2012, at 18:25, Guédon Jean-Claude wrote:
> I have been observing this discussi
