My friend Henk Moed (whose work I admire and whose scientific
integrity I am in no way calling into question!) has replied to my
query:
"Where on earth did Henk get the idea that some institutions'
self-archiving 'did not increase when their OA regime was transformed
from non-mandatory into manda
My friend Henk Moed (whose work I admire and whose scientific
integrity I am in no way calling into question!) has replied to my
query:
"Where on earth did Henk get the idea that some institutions'
self-archiving 'did not increase when their OA regime was transformed
from non-mandatory into manda
@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On
Behalf Of Andrew A. Adams
Sent: 23 March 2012 09:08
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Tireless Ad Hoc Critiques of OA Study After OA
Study: Will Wishful Thinking Ever Cease?
> Is it really common sense? You wri
eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On
Behalf Of Andrew A. Adams
Sent: 23 March 2012 09:08
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Tireless Ad Hoc Critiques of OA Study After OA
Study: Will Wishful Thinking Ever Cease?
> Is it really common sense
I wrote:
> > You are putting the cart before the horse here. A decision to cite
> > depends (when the researcher is doing their job properly) on being
> > able to read. Only after an article has been read can the decision
> > to cite or not come into it.
Jan replied:
> Of course, quite right: you
I wrote:
> > You are putting the cart before the horse here. A decision to cite
> > depends (when the researcher is doing their job properly) on being
> > able to read. Only after an article has been read can the decision
> > to cite or not come into it.
Jan replied:
> Of course, quite right: you
> Is it really common sense? You write: "Not only is OA research
> downloaded and cited more -- as common sense would expect, as a result
> of making it accessible free for all, rather than just for those whose
> institutions can afford a subscription".
>
> First, downloaded more - I can agree.
> Is it really common sense? You write: "Not only is OA research
> downloaded and cited more -- as common sense would expect, as a result
> of making it accessible free for all, rather than just for those whose
> institutions can afford a subscription".
>
> First, downloaded more - I can agree.
ehalf Of
Stevan Harnad
Sent: vrijdag 23 maart 2012 10:14
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Tireless Ad Hoc Critiques of OA Study After OA Study: Will
Wishful Thinking Ever Cease?
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Jan W. Schoones, Walaeus Library, The
Netherlands,
ehalf
Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: vrijdag 23 maart 2012 10:14
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Tireless Ad Hoc Critiques of OA Study After OA Study: Will
Wishful Thinking Ever Cease?
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Jan W. Schoones, Walaeus Library, The
Netherlands,
g/monitoring%20statement.htm>.
--
-Original Message-
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Stevan Harnad
Sent: 23 March 2012 09:14
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Tireless Ad Hoc
g/monitoring%20statement.htm>.
--
-Original Message-
From: goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 23 March 2012 09:14
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Tireless Ad Hoc
Dear Jan,
> the citations to articles will not be hampered by accessibility.
You're kidding me right?
It's quite common to have points in a manuscript that need to be
supported by several references (X 2001; Y 2002; Z 2003). In these
instances, in my experience researchers use the most famous ex
Dear Jan,
> the citations to articles will not be hampered by accessibility.
You're kidding me right?
It's quite common to have points in a manuscript that need to be
supported by several references (X 2001; Y 2002; Z 2003). In these
instances, in my experience researchers use the most famous ex
Dear Stevan,
Is it really common sense? You write: "Not only is OA research downloaded and
cited more -- as common sense would expect, as a result of making it accessible
free for all, rather than just for those whose institutions can afford a
subscription".
First, downloaded more - I can agre
Dear Stevan,
Is it really common sense? You write: "Not only is OA research downloaded and
cited more -- as common sense would expect, as a result of making it accessible
free for all, rather than just for those whose institutions can afford a
subscription".
First, downloaded more - I can agre
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Jan W. Schoones, Walaeus Library,
The Netherlands, wrote:
> You write: "Not only is OA research downloaded and cited more -- as common
> sense would expect, as a result of making it accessible free for all, rather
> than just for those whose institutions can af
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Jan W. Schoones, Walaeus Library,
The Netherlands, wrote:
> You write: "Not only is OA research downloaded and cited more -- as common
> sense would expect, as a result of making it accessible free for all, rather
> than just for those whose institutions can af
18 matches
Mail list logo
