[GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT

2012-02-18 Thread Subbiah Arunachalam
at eprints.org Sent: Wednesday, 18 January 2012, 10:29 Subject: [GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT The best place for petition-signing is probably Popvox. They (supposedly) provide summary reports directly to legislative offices. https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr3699

[GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT

2012-01-11 Thread Thomas Krichel
Michael Eisen writes I have an op-ed in today's NYT about the Research Works Act Excellent job. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/11/opinion/research-bought-then-paid-for.html I especially note Libraries should cut off their supply of money by canceling subscriptions. Finally

[GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT

2012-01-11 Thread David Prosser
Oh come on Thomas, I know you like to be provocative, but: It is not libraries that submit their papers to publishers and sign over exclusive rights, nor is it libraries that compel researchers to do so. It is not libraries that provide peer-review services to publishers for free It is not

[GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT

2012-01-11 Thread Steve Hitchcock
The publishers' approach with Research Works Act is crass and indefensible. However, what Michael Eisen says is: Libraries should cut off their supply of money by canceling subscriptions. And most important, the N.I.H., universities and other public and private agencies that sponsor academic

[GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT

2012-01-11 Thread Thomas Krichel
David Prosser writes Oh come on Thomas, I know you like to be provocative, but: I think it better to stick to the issues, rather than personalise the debate. It is not libraries that submit their papers to publishers and sign over exclusive rights, nor is it libraries that compel

[GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT

2012-01-11 Thread David Prosser
Thomas Your original assertion was: It is libraries, rather than publishers or researchers, that hold back open access. The point I was trying to make was that it is researchers who maintain the current system by submitting their papers to subscription journals; it is researchers who who

[GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT

2012-01-11 Thread Peter Murray-Rust
Although I am trying to find time to craft my own response is there any coordinated action on this issue. Somewhere where we can point 10,000 people to and simply get them to add to the count. We did this is Europe for software patents and get 250,000 signatures. I have 30 people tomorrow that I

[GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT

2012-01-11 Thread Graham Steel
: [GOAL] Re: op-ed on Research Works Act in today's NYT Although I am trying to find time to craft my own response is there any coordinated action on this issue. Somewhere where we can point 10,000 people to and simply get them to add to the count. We did this is Europe for software patents and get