Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-04 Thread Arthur Sale
August 2009 10:31 PM To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org Subject: Re: [AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM] Authors Re-using Their Own Work   The Austrlain Act does indeed permit fair dealing for one's own research or private study;  but it doesn't permit

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-04 Thread C . Oppenheim
Subject: Re: [AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM] Authors Re-using Their Own Work I now understand why Arthur and I disagree. He is referring to Australian Copyright Law, and I am referring to UK law. I am happy to accept that Arthur's approach is accurate in Australian law

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-04 Thread Laurence Bebbington
of Nottingham From: American Scientist Open Access Forum on behalf of Arthur Sale Sent: Tue 04/08/2009 03:30 To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org Subject: Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work Charles   You

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-02 Thread Heather Morrison
On 1-Aug-09, at 6:15 PM, Arthur Sale wrote: Charles The Australian Act makes no mention of who does the reproduction. Whether I make a reproduction/copy (say electronic by email, or photocopy my manuscript or the journal, or some other form of copy) of my article to give to my PhD student, or

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-02 Thread Heather Morrison
On 2-Aug-09, at 11:26 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote: (If any service is facilitating fulfillment in the case of the Button, it is computational services, via the IR software, rather than library services!) Comment: this depends on which department is managing the IR. In Canada, this is generally the

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-01 Thread Arthur Sale
] On Behalf Of Couture Marc Sent: Saturday, 1 August 2009 5:22 AM To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org Subject: Re: [AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM] Authors Re-using Their Own Work   On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:19 AM, c.oppenh...@lboro.ac.ukc.oppenh...@lboro.ac.uk wrote

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-01 Thread Stevan Harnad
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:20 AM, C.Oppenheimc.oppenh...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: CO: Yes of course fair use and similar exceptions to copyright allow one to make a copy of item whose copyright is owned by someone else for oneself for research or private study as long as that copying does not damage

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-01 Thread C . Oppenheim
[ The following text is in the utf-8 character set. ] [ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ] [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ] Stevan and others are of course correct that IN PRACTICE there is little a publisher can do to stop this sort of activity,

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-01 Thread C . Oppenheim
] Authors Re-using Their Own Work On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:19 AM, mailto:c.oppenh...@lboro.ac.uk%3cc.oppenh...@lboro.ac.uk c.oppenh...@lboro.ac.ukc.oppenh...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: CO: The query referred to cases where the author has ASSIGNED copyright to Sage. Sage then owns

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-01 Thread Stevan Harnad
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, C.Oppenheim wrote: Thus, in law, if Dr Jones asks Dr Smith for an electronic copy of Dr. Smith's article, and Dr Smith gave away the copyright to Megacorp Publishers, then Dr Smith should strictly not supply that copy... Stevan and others are of course correct that IN

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-01 Thread Stevan Harnad
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Klaus Grafklausg...@googlemail.com wrote: I do not think that using the request button is a valid OA strategy. My own experience was that I received few response when requesting an article. The St. Gallen IR manager said that requesters can obtain much more

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-08-01 Thread Dana Roth
Isn't this similar to the 'right of way' laws which preclude property owners from putting up a fence across a long-used public path through private property. It would seem that a long term absence of any active attempt to restrict authors from sharing their publications for non-commercial

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-07-31 Thread Couture Marc
Harnad Envoyé : 27 juillet 2009 07:02 À : american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org Objet : Authors Re-using Their Own Work     On 27-Jul-09, at 5:39 AM, [identity deleted] wrote: Hello Stevan, Could I ask you to have a quick look at SAGE's terms for Authors Re-using Their Own

Re: [SOAF] Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-07-28 Thread Stevan Harnad
[ The following text is in the windows-1252 character set. ] [ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ] [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ] On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:52 PM, JQ Johnsonj...@uoregon.edu wrote: On Jul 27, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Stevan Harnad

Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-07-27 Thread Stevan Harnad
On 27-Jul-09, at 5:39 AM, [identity deleted] wrote: Hello Stevan, Could I ask you to have a quick look at SAGE's terms for Authors Re-using Their Own Work?  It seems to me that it forbids the email eprint request button: http://www.sagepub.com/repository/binaries

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-07-27 Thread c.oppenh...@lboro.ac.uk
  From: American Scientist Open Access Forum [mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On Behalf Of Stevan Harnad Sent: 27 July 2009 12:02 To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org Subject: Authors Re-using Their Own Work On 27-Jul-09, at 5:39

Re: Authors Re-using Their Own Work

2009-07-27 Thread Stevan Harnad
Scientist Open Access Forum [mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On Behalf Of Stevan Harnad Sent: 27 July 2009 12:02 To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org Subject: Authors Re-using Their Own Work On 27-Jul-09, at 5:39 AM, [identity