(Morris Associates)
Sent: Friday, 10 October 2008 12:45 AM
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: [AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM] Brisbane
declaration on Open Access (fwd)
Perhaps it's worth just pointing out that the Version of Record
This declaration has got swallowed up amongst the c**P that has
polluted this forum in the last days. May I tease out a few strands
of the Brisbane Declaration for readers of the list, as a person who
was at the OAR Conference in Brisbane.
1. The Declaration was adopted on the voices at the
On 9-Oct-08, at 7:37 AM, Peter D. Mosses wrote:
Could you clarify the following point:
5. At the same time, it was widely recognized that publishers' pdfs
(Versions of Record) were not the preferred version of an article to
hold in a repository, primarily because a pdf is a print-based
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: Brisbane declaration on Open Access (fwd)
This declaration has got swallowed up amongst the c**P that has
polluted this forum in the last days. May I tease out a few strands
of the Brisbane Declaration for readers of the list
Cross-Posted
-- Forwarded message --
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:11:58 +1000
From: Tom Cochrane t.cochrane -- qut.edu.au
To: peters -- earlham.edu peters -- earlham.edu,
'Stevan Harnad' har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk, Alma Swan
