Re: Clarification of "parasitism" and copyright (David Goodman)

2002-02-11 Thread Albert Henderson
seria...@list.uvm.edu List-Post: goal@eprints.org List-Post: goal@eprints.org Date: 2/8/2002 5:19 PM RE: Re: Clarification of "parasitism" and copyright (David Goodman) -- Forwarded message -- List-Post: goal@eprints.org List-Post: goal@eprints.org Date: Fri, 8

Clarification of "parasitism" and copyright (Stevan Harnad)

2002-02-08 Thread Albert Henderson
on Thu, 7 Feb 2002 Marcia Tuttle forwarded: > Re: Clarification of "parasitism" and copyright (Stevan Harnad) > > -- Forwarded message -- > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 03:55:55 + > From: Stevan Harnad > Subject: Clarification of "parasitism&

Re: Clarification of "parasitism" and copyright

2002-02-07 Thread Bernard Lang
you also have symbions ... and that is even more positive bernard On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:19:35PM +, Stevan Harnad wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Chris Rusbridge wrote: > > > Stevan, remember the difference between parasites and epiphytes. Parasites > > kill their hosts. That does not seem t

Re: Clarification of "parasitism" and copyright

2002-02-07 Thread Stevan Harnad
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Chris Rusbridge wrote: > Stevan, remember the difference between parasites and epiphytes. Parasites > kill their hosts. That does not seem to be quite what you are saying. Very astute point by Chris! Yes, epiphyte is the apter metaphor: Self-archiving will not kill its host bu

Clarification of "parasitism" and copyright

2002-02-07 Thread Stevan Harnad
I forward here the correction of a very important error made by one of the supporters of free access: > Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 18:18:04 + (GMT) > From: [Identity Removed] > > 3) So, I do believe that publishing will make a transition from publishers > owning copyright -and restricting the peopl