OASPA Board Member Mark Patterson, who currently chairs the DOI Event
Tracker (DET) Working Group, has written for the OASPA blog providing a bit
more background to the about the project and how he hopes DET will provide
a core piece of infrastructure that will help to accelerate progress in
open
At 09:16 12/02/01 +, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Your interpretation is correct. DOI is proprietary, OAI is open.
See: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm
In the context of the debate below there are a number of subtle
distinctions that might be worth making to avoid confusion
I should perhaps offer an additional fine distinction about jake. A
quick glance at the literature for jake suggests it is a database and a
linking service, but I think strictly it is a 'facility' for linking,
i.e. it needs additional support to be used for linking. The Openly
service I refer to
Greetings,
On Friday, February 16, 2001, at 04:38 AM, Leslie Chan wrote:
However, for scholarly or scientific publishers who wish to have their
publications easily searchable, interoperable and interlinkable with
other publications, DOI is neither sufficient nor necessary.
This is correct
