of which software is adopted:
Developing a Policy
http://software.eprints.org/handbook/policy.php
http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php
EPrints, DSpace or ESpace?
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2670.html
2. What is the guarantee for upgrading
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Philip Hunter wrote:
The focus of each of the OAI-compliant archive-creating softwares is
different, as you acknowledge, since some are designed to archive digital
objects in general, not just eprints. The functionality of the different
softwares differs on this account,
/OA_NOA_biologie.gif
So, to repeat: it doesn't *matter* which of the archive-creating
softwares a university uses: What matters is adopting and implementing
a policy that will *fill* its archives, as soon and full as possible,
with the university's own journal article output.
Eprints, Dspace, or Espace
Publishing and Library/Learning Solutions (PALS)
PALS Conference 04 - Institutional Repositories and Their Impact on Publishing
http://www.palsgroup.org.uk/palsconference04
Institutional repositories-web-based, institution-focused archives
of scholarly content-have been receiving
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
[Moderator's Note: Below is the notice for a joint
open-source/open-access conference at University of Toronto. Eprints
is again prominent for its absence: only Dspace is featured, but
it looks like a worthwhile event anyway. See also
Prior Topic Thread:
EPrints, DSpace or ESpace?
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2670.html
2 Open Access News Posting by Garrett Eastman:
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2004_04_11_fosblogarchive.html#a108179305530712543
Skeptical eye on Google repository
[2 Postings: (1) L. Waaijers; (2) T. Brody]
(1) Leo Waaijers (SURF, Netherlands)
Stevan Harnad wrote:
By the way, the real OAI google is OAIster, and it
contains over 3 million pearls from nearly 300 institutions
http://oaister.umdl.umich.edu/o/oaister/ but many are not journal articles
Peter Suber reports in Open Access News
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2004_03_14_fosblogarchive.html#a107979070605922309
DSpace Federation now open to all
The DSpace Federation http://www.dspace.org/ is now open to
everyone. The federation welcomes new members who can contribute
This topic thread:
EPrints, DSpace or ESpace?
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2670.html
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2837.html
Peter Suber reported the following in Open Access News
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Neil Beagrie wrote:
the final version of the report by Maggie Jones from the e-journal
archiving study is now available in pdf on the jisc website at
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ejournalsfinal.pdf
This report has useful information for those who are
William Nixon says the question most frequently asked of the DAEDALUS
project is 'Why are you using both EPrints and DSpace? His admirably
thorough and practical Ariadne article
DAEDALUS: Initial experiences with EPrints and DSpace at the
University of Glasgow
I'm doing a Mastes Degree in Library and Information Science at the
Cologne Technical University (Fachhochschule Koeln). I'm writing a thesis
about non-commercial publication models of scholastic writings. Your
distinction between pre- and postprint and the definition of eprints as
all of them is
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Maurizio Grilli wrote:
I'm doing a Masters Degree in Library and Information Science at the
Cologne Technical University (Fachhochschule Koeln). I'm writing a thesis
about non-commercial publication models of scholastic writings.
I know of no non-commercial models for
Probably of interest to readers of this list:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030616/03
Jan Velterop
BioMed Central
Middlesex House
34-42 Cleveland Street
London W1T 4LB
UK
T. +44 (0)20 7323 0323
www.biomedcentral.com
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Bob Parks wrote:
sh There is no need to generate PDF. All the Eprint archives require is
sh one text version, screen-readable and harvestable by full-text inverters.
Well, then it is on US to be sure that the requirements are known, and that
they are easy requirements, and
I suspect that it would be a good idea to incorporate such a
service, or even point to such services.
There already exists many such services.
We provide one at CERN at http://doc.cern.ch/Convert/.
And you will also find from there links to a few other similar servers...
Regards,
JY
CERN
Steve, you have the numbers right but the implications backwards:
If old versions of Word are a problem, then WE (the preachers) ought
to remove those impediments to getting it into archives.
WE preachers are few, whereas THEY (authors) are many (about 2,000,000
peer-reviewed journal
output.
Most of this is discussed in the thread:
EPrints, DSpace or ESpace?
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2670.html
This is also the source of the slowness in archive-filling
lamented by Michael Day in the article below. The remedy,
again, is clearly distinguishing
* research output.
Most of this is discussed in the thread:
EPrints, DSpace or ESpace?
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2670.html
This is also the source of the slowness in archive-filling
lamented by Michael Day in the article below. The remedy,
again, is clearly
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, David Goodman wrote:
I can testify personally to one of the strong disincentives, though it
sounds trivial.
I work in an old version of MS Word...
The version I use does not automatically make pdfs...
...the pdfs produced this way do not have full functionality...
I
Stevan Harnad writes:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, David Goodman wrote:
I can testify personally to one of the strong disincentives, though it
sounds trivial.
I work in an old version of MS Word...
The version I use does not automatically make pdfs...
...the pdfs produced this way do not have full
-- Forwarded message --
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 15:05:29 +0100
From: NA Jacobs, Learning and Research Technology neil.jac...@bristol.ac.uk
To: oai-epri...@fafner.openlib.org
Subject: [OAI-eprints] dspace / eprints
Does anyone
-
From: Stevan Harnad [mailto:har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: 14 April 2003 16:53
To: lis-e...@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re: EPrints, DSpace or ESpace?
-- Forwarded message --
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 15:05:29 +0100
From: NA
[This message contains some long quotes. Please bear with me!]
At 10:20 16/02/2003 -0500, Dempsey,Lorcan commented on Les Carr's comment:
The Open in OAIS comes from the fact that the standard is open (the
archives may be closed), whereas OAI and BOAI assume open distribution
of metadata
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:50:42 +
From: Leslie Carr l...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@amsci.org
DS How much do either [EPrints or DSpace -- or http://cdsware.cern.ch/]
DS conform to the OAIS reference model?
SH How much do they *need* to (and why?), in
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Robert Spindler wrote:
This exchange... illustrates the difficult tension archivists feel these
days between preservation and access. The scholarly research community
has profound opportunities to improve the speed and availability
of very current research results through
Don't forget CERN Document Server Software (CDSware) http://cdsware.cern.ch/
At 12:42 11/02/03 +, vous avez écrit:
It is rather ironic that a choice between two free self-archiving
softwares should lately be holding up self-archiving!
Should I use http://www.eprints.org/ or
I want to add to Stevan's remark that the free availability of many
different software for self-archiving is intended to boost the OA
movement, not to slow it down !
And if CERN has also released last year its document server as GNU (from
http://cdsware.cern.ch), it is with the idea that it may
Apologies for failing to mention CERN's wonderful self-archiving software
http://cdsware.cern.ch/ (and many thanks to Helene Bosc and JY Le Meur
for promptly pointing out my error!). Yes, all software for facilitating
institutional research self-archiving is eagerly and gratefully
welcomed! The
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, D M Sergeant
raises some frequently-raised points that I think it is important to
confront head-on:
The digital library community is very much concerned with preservation,
which is both commendable and a traditional responsibility of the
library community.
But there are two
SH On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, D M Sergeant raises some frequently-raised points
SH that I think it is important to confront head-on:
SH
SH The digital library community is very much concerned with preservation,
SH which is both commendable and a traditional responsibility of the
SH library community.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, D M Sergeant wrote:
DS So preservation should focus on tolled publications, and not
DS self-publications? Self-archiving systems cannot have a
DS preservation component?
(1) Self-archiving is self-archiving, not self-publication.
32 matches
Mail list logo
