I've been enjoying the discussion about High Energy Physics (HEP)
publishing and the arXiv, and wanted to make a few observations.
1) One piece of information in the recent work of Gentil-Beccot,
Brooks and Mele http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.5418v1 is that papers put on
the arXiv and never published
On 21/07/2009 21:40, Sally Morris sa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk wrote:
I merely reported what I was told by my IOPP contacts; clearly, however,
not everyone there agreed with that view. I can't cite it because I can't
now find it (I no longer have access to all the documents I had as
: 21 July 2009 13:32
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation Advantage
Since my informants are no longer at IOP, I can't give you chapter and
verse, but assure you I'm not making it up (and it was about
Subject: FW: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation
Advantage
Am I the only person who thinks this just isn't good enough? We need
either
a citation or a retraction.
David
-Original Message-
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american
Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Hitchcock
Sent: 22 July 2009 10:14
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation
Advantage
This case
] On
Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 20 July 2009 16:35
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation
Advantage
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Sally
Morrissa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk wrote:
It could
Since my informants are no longer at IOP, I can't give you chapter and
verse, but assure you I'm not making it up (and it was about subscriptions).
I recall a speaker at an ALPSP seminar telling us much the same story for
London Mathematical Society journals.
My concern is not about whether
)
Sent: 21 July 2009 10:44
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation
Advantage
Since my informants are no longer at IOP, I can't give you chapter and
verse, but assure you I'm not making it up
...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: FW: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation Advantage
Am I the only person who thinks this just isn't good enough? We need either
a citation or a retraction.
David
-Original Message-
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american
-Original Message-
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On
Behalf Of Alma Swan
Sent: 21 July 2009 13:32
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On
Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 18 July 2009 03:52
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation
Advantage
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Dana Roth
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On
Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 18 July 2009 03:52
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation
Advantage
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Dana
Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On
Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:09 PM
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation
Advantage
Version
16:35
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation
Advantage
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Sally
Morrissa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk wrote:
It could be that the HE physicists (a) value journals
Sally Morris said:
Stevan is, I'm sure, well aware that IOP at least has claimed that point (2)
is erroneous and that it was misquoted by Swan
Eh? Swan stands by her original report.
All the quotes were written down verbatim during telephone conversations or
came to me by email, and all were
[ The following text is in the windows-1252 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
Version with hyperlinks:
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/607-guid.html
Gentil-Beccot, Anne;
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: OA in High Energy Physics Arxiv Yields Five-Fold Citation Advantage
Version with hyperlinks:
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/607-guid.html
Gentil-Beccot, Anne; Salvatore Mele, Travis Brooks (2009) Citing
17 matches
Mail list logo
