References: 200909150629161.SM03840@[64.239.149.125]
721c5fd7-b6dd-4c5d-9c3c-a651c3cd0...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
EMEW3|e87724ac058e36a4a66c0af79e862ef9l8EFGs03lac|ecs.soton.ac.uk|6DD-4C5D-
9c3c-a651c3cd0...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
002101ca3652$40ba2680$c22e7380$@com.au
4ab0c9bc.5030...@ulcc.ac.uk
2009/10/6 Stevan Harnad har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk:
Begin forwarded message:
(4) The difference between the publisher's PDF and the author's
self-archived final refereed, revised draft are completely trivial. This is
not something a researcher would worry about. Researchers are worried about
On 5-Oct-09, at 8:49 PM, Klaus Graf wrote:
2009/10/6 Stevan Harnad har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk:
(5) A journal issue is just a hodge-podge of mostly unrelated
articles; no
need to reconstruct that; open access to all the articles plus good
boolean search power is all that's needed.
I do
There is, it seems to me, an unacknowledged non-dysfunctional purpose
served by journal issues that would be difficult to satisfy with any
search interface: non-duplication. Once a researcher has scanned the
table of contents for an issue looking for articles of interest, that
person feels no need
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Arthur Smith apsm...@aps.org wrote:
There is, it seems to me, an unacknowledged non-dysfunctional purpose
served by journal issues that would be difficult to satisfy with any
search interface: non-duplication...Though perhaps that's what you were
implying by
oktober 2009 19:24
To: jisc-repositor...@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Parallel journals
Sorry that I did have an idea of my own.
Stevan Harnad wrote:
(1) We don't need parallel journals: we just need parallel ACCESS
to the articles in the journals that already exist.
(2) That's what green OA
@eprints.org
Date: October 2, 2009 1:12:37 PM EDT (CA)
To: jisc-repositor...@jiscmail.ac.uk
Cc: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: Parallel journals
(1) We don't need parallel journals: we just need parallel ACCESS to the
articles in the journals that already
@eprints.org
Date: October 5, 2009 9:11:36 AM EDT (CA)
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Cc: jisc-repositor...@jiscmail.ac.uk, SPARC Open Access Forum
sparc-oafo...@arl.org
Subject: Re: Parallel journals
On 5-Oct-09, at 3:44 AM, Kuil, van der Annemiek wrote:
Apparently
@eprints.org
Date: October 5, 2009 10:19:31 AM EDT (CA)
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Cc: jisc-repositor...@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Parallel journals
On 5-Oct-09, at 4:49 AM, Talat Chaudhri wrote:
This attitude is also reported quite widely in Britain, certainly
[ The following text is in the WINDOWS-1252 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
(1) We don't need parallel journals: we just need parallel ACCESS
to the articles in the journals that already
Hi,
Today, thinking hard again about the (dis)advantages of Green OA the
following idea flashed through my mind. Green OA leads to `parallel
articles', i.e. the post prints of the pdf's in official journals.
Why not having `parallel journals' as well? It's not so difficult I
think. Someone has
11 matches
Mail list logo
