not as a supplement to peer review, but as an
alternative.
You'll see the same untested view in the developed world too (and
even among some of the physicists and mathematicians who have been
self-archiving pre-refereeing preprints for years).
Peer Review Reform Hypothesis-Testing (started 1999
MODERATOR'S NOTE: Because it is mainly about peer-review
reform, the posting below has been re-directed from
the prior Eprint versions and removals thread to:
Peer Review Reform Hypothesis-Testing
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/0479.html
A Note of Caution
On Tue, 11 Aug 2004, Heather Morrison wrote:
While I fully agree with Stevan that we need to proceed with OA given what
we have immediately, and not wait for all the nuances to be perfected,
I would like to second Ted's suggestion that full green be reserved
for publishers who provide the
.
http://www.nature.com/nature/webmatters/invisible/invisible.html
Peer Review Reform Hypothesis-Testing
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/0479.html
A Note of Caution About Reforming the System
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/1169.html
, or redirected toward peer-review reform. (There are too many
things needlessly delaying it already!)
See:
Peer Review Reform Hypothesis-Testing
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/0479.html
A Note of Caution About Reforming the System
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad
Invisible Hand(s)
Quality Assurance in the Age of Author Self-Archiving
I am pleased to announce the publication of my recent contribution to
Jekyll.comm: International Journal of Science Communication
http://jekyll.sissa.it/jekyll_comm/home_eng.htm
titled
Invisible
: 01903 871457 E-mail: sec-...@alpsp.org
ALPSP Website http://www.alpsp.org
- Original Message -
From: Stevan Harnad har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: Peer Review Reform Hypothesis
On Wed, 21 May 2003 [identity deleted] wrote:
[I have been asked] to find some information on International
Peer Review standards. Having read your article I
thought you would have some information. Would you point me
in the right direction to any standards information please?
I'm afraid
research evaluation in terms of citations and impact is one valuable
approach. it's a type of productivity analysis. however certain important
published observations lie fallow for many years because of their
originality.
another complementary research evaluative procedure would be pedigree
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Sergio Della Sala and Jordan Grafman wrote:
We are convinced that peer-review is central to scientific credibility.
However, as it stands the process is far from watertight. Is there any
way we can improve it by suggesting any modification, either radical or
minimal? Time
/issue5/peer-review/
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/nature2.html
Peer Review Reform Hypothesis-Testing
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/0479.html
A Note of Caution About 'Reforming the System'
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/1169.html
Stevan Harnad
For information about the 4th International Congress on Peer Review,
registration, hotel, etc, please visit our website:
www.jama-peer.org
Thank you for your patience while we were working on this project.
Sincerely,
Jeni Reiling
Dear Dr. Harnad,
My book on the peer review system, Tomorrow's Cures Today?
How to Reform the Health Research System, is, I am happy to say, now
published by Harwood Academic. Further information may be found at the
web-sites below. May I suggest a copy for your university library.
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Andrew Kenneth Fletcher wrote:
I have a real problem with the current Peer Review System. It is biased
towards in-house publications and outsiders are ignored.
I had an idea to set up a new newsgroup titled Peer Review Sci I am
certain that it would attract many
Hi Stevan Harnad
I have a real problem with the current Peer Review System. It is biased
towards in-house publications and outsiders are ignored.
I had an idea to set up a new newsgroup titled Peer Review Sci I am
certain that it would attract many professional contributors, who would
normally
A pilot trial of electronic post-peer review has been conducted by an
American Psychological Association electronic journal which I initially
supported in the hope of eliciting post peer review by a knowledgeable
group.
http://journals.apa.org/prevention/
My own view is that the results are
16 matches
Mail list logo
