Re: Review Journals

2001-11-26 Thread Stevan Harnad
Re: http://text-e.org/debats/ A-Priori Peer Review vs. A-Posteriori Review and Commentary (on Peer-Reviewed Research) Stevan Harnad The function of peer review (refereeing) in research publication is both to shape and to label the quality of published research. It is a dynamic process, involving

Re: Review Journals

2001-06-13 Thread Albert Henderson
The shortage for post-graduate researchers, practitioners, and policy makers is in state-of-the-art reviews that are comprehensive and authoritative. For instance, the standards of many medical journals for reporting expensive clinical trials (CONSORT) recomm

Re: Review Journals

2001-06-13 Thread Donald R. Forsdyke
Sorry: http://www.els.net/

Re: Review Journals

2001-06-13 Thread Donald R. Forsdyke
At 12:22 PM 2001-06-13 +0100, you wrote: The shortage for post-graduate researchers, practitioners, and policy makers is in state-of-the art reviews ... Albert Henderson <70244.1...@compuserve.com> The need for reviews is well appreciated by those producing modern on-line and

Review Journals

2001-06-12 Thread David Goodman
The last few years has seen the remarkable success of a number of review journals from different publishers: The "Current Opinion in ..." and the "Trends in ..." series from Current Biology (now Elsevier), and now the Nature reviews (at a somewhat lower level of intelle