...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: [AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM] STM Publisher
Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit Mandates
There were questions about how they accessed copies of articles.
However, the question we're discussing related specifically to the
situation where they did
-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org]
On Behalf Of Arthur Sale
Sent: 20 January 2009 21:29
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit
Mandates
Sally
They could have meant that they used a famous
-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM] STM Publisher
Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit Mandates
I would assume that those who said they never accessed self-archived
versions, even when they had no access to the print version, must
have meant that they never even tried to do so (for a variety
on Institution Repository Deposit
Mandates
A meta question ~
If we can form conclusions based on research results reported in this
manner, does this mean that can we safely dispense with peer review
and formal publication?
For the avoidance of doubt: I do see the value of peer review and
formal publication
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org]
On Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 19 January 2009 23:49
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org]
On Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 19 January 2009 23:36
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository
Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org]
On Behalf Of Sally Morris (Morris Associates)
Sent: 20 January 2009 10:53
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit
Mandates
OK
[ The following text is in the utf-8 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
I started my career in information work as a full-time scientific
copy-editor at The Biochemical Society in London. I can
: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org]
On Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 19 January 2009 23:36
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit
Of J.F.Rowland
Sent: 20 January 2009 13:43
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit
Mandates
I started my career in information work as a full-time scientific
copy-editor at The Biochemical Society
The only statement in Stevan's commentary that I find surprising
and questionable--because it is stated with such certainty of its
truth, with no reference to any empirical backing, which is
unusual for Stevan--is the claim that it is exceedingly rare
(Stevan's emphasis) for copyediting to
...@lists.yale.edu
[mailto:owner-liblicens...@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Phil Davis
Sent: 16 January 2009 00:22
To: liblicens...@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit
Mandates
Regarding Joe Esposito's question about whether digital archives
can siphon
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Sandy Thatcher s...@psu.edu wrote:
The only statement in Stevan's commentary that I find
surprising
and questionable--because it is stated with such
certainty of its
truth, with no reference to any empirical backing, which
is
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Sally Morris (Morris Associates)
sa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk wrote:
Sue Thorn and I will shortly be publishing a report of a
research
study on the attitudes and behaviour of 1368 members of
UK-based
learned societies in the life
A meta question ~
If we can form conclusions based on research results reported in this
manner, does this mean that can we safely dispense with peer review
and formal publication?
For the avoidance of doubt: I do see the value of peer review and
formal publication. Before coming to any
** Apologies for Cross-Posting **
[Two members of STM have kindly, at my request, allowed me to see a
copy of the STM Briefing on IRs and Deposit Mandates. I focused the
commentary below on quoted excerpts, but before posting it I
asked STM CEO Michael Mabe for permission to include the
16 matches
Mail list logo
