: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: Submission Fees (was: RE: Overlay Journals Over Again...)
A subscription journal charging submission fees (or acceptance
fees or both) seems like a bit of double- (or triple-) dipping ,
unless it is honestly faithfully and fully translated into lower
...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: Submission Fees (was: RE: Overlay Journals Over Again...)
On 5-Jul-09, at 4:37 AM, Jan Velterop wrote:
So it seems double-dipping unless it's honest? Perhaps it's honest
unless it's clearly double-dipping.
A very wide-spread misconception, on this list and elsewhere
...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: Submission Fees (was: RE: Overlay Journals Over Again...)
Heather Morrison:
If 10% of last year's revenue
stream is coming from publication charges, prices should be decreased
by 10%. OR, libraries and others such as funding agencies,
departments, etc., should
-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On
Behalf Of Bill Hooker
Sent: 05 July 2009 21:26
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: Submission Fees (was: RE: Overlay Journals Over Again...)
Heather Morrison:
If 10% of last year's revenue
stream
call a misunderstanding my suggesting more
transparency here?
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: Stevan Harnad har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
To: liblicens...@lists.yale.edu
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: Submission Fees (was: RE: Overlay Journals Over Again...)
A subscription
: Thursday, July 02, 2009 11:08 PM
To: liblicens...@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Submission Fees (was: RE: Overlay
Journals Over Again...)
The idea of submission fees is one that we at the
California
Digital Library have also repeatedly attempted to
advance
02, 2009 11:08 PM
To: liblicens...@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Submission Fees (was: RE: Overlay Journals Over Again...)
The idea of submission fees is one that we at the California
Digital Library have also repeatedly attempted to advance in
recent years. Publishers frequently cite the steep rise
On 5-Jul-09, at 4:37 AM, Jan Velterop wrote:
So it seems double-dipping unless it's honest? Perhaps it's honest
unless it's clearly double-dipping.
A very wide-spread misconception, on this list and elsewhere, is that
subscriptions somehow are priced linearly.
Comment:
Publisher revenue is
(was: RE:
Overlay Journals Over Again...)
On 5-Jul-09, at 4:37 AM, Jan Velterop wrote:
So it seems double-dipping unless it's honest? Perhaps it's honest
unless it's clearly double-dipping.
A very wide-spread misconception, on this list and elsewhere, is that
subscriptions somehow are priced
Heather Morrison:
If 10% of last year's revenue
stream is coming from publication charges, prices should be decreased
by 10%. OR, libraries and others such as funding agencies,
departments, etc., should not support the publication charges.
While I have seen publishers claim that OA uptake is
-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: [CLS Junk released by Allow List] Re: Submission Fees
(was: RE: Overlay Journals Over Again...)
On 5-Jul-09, at 4:37 AM, Jan Velterop wrote:
So it seems double-dipping unless it's honest? Perhaps it's honest
unless it's clearly double-dipping
: Overlay Journals Over Again...)
Heather Morrison:
If 10% of last year's revenue
stream is coming from publication charges, prices should be decreased
by 10%. OR, libraries and others such as funding agencies,
departments, etc., should not support the publication charges.
[Bill Hjooker:}
While
-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: [CLS Junk released by Allow List] Re: [CLS Junk released by Allow
List] Re: Submission Fees (was: RE: Overlay Journals Over
Again...)
Clarification: PLoS One is among the world's largest journals,
anticipating publication of about 4,800
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 11:08 PM
To: liblicens...@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Submission Fees (was: RE: Overlay Journals
Over Again...)
The idea of submission fees is one that we at the
California
Digital Library have also repeatedly attempted to advance
14 matches
Mail list logo
