on Wed, 27 Nov 2002 Arkadiusz Jadczyk a...@cassiopaea.org wrote
But the main problem in this thread is the proceder of peer reviewing
and what to do about it. For me the action of the editor of Classical
and Quantum and Gravity is just funny. If they are really serious, they
should
Are referees for second rate journals less likely to steal your article?
On
Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Arkadiusz Jadczyk wrote:
I can't refrain from quoting the pertinent piece from Chance and Chaos by
David Ruelle. (Notes 5 and 7 to Chapter 11, p. 179-180)
A few words about rejected papers may be
There is an interesting article in The Economist of this week
(November 16th-22nd) which raises questions about the scientific
peer-review system:
http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1441745
I am afraid that this article is not Open Access but the story and the
facts can
At 10:37 PM 11/18/2002 -0200, you wrote:
There is an interesting article in The Economist of this week
(November 16th-22nd) which raises questions about the scientific
peer-review system:
http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1441745
I am afraid that this article is not
