On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Hans-Christoph Stephan wrote:
dear Mr. Harnad,
the University of Bielefeld says, it's the first german university which
will support Open Access officially and relates to Berlin declaration.
best regards,
Hans-Christoph Stephan
- editor - duz-Redaktion www.duz.de
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Hans-Christoph Stephan wrote:
the University of Bielefeld says it's the first german university which
will support Open Access officially and relates to Berlin declaration.
The University of Bielefeld has just registered its OA Self-Archiving Policy:
Prior AmSci Topic Thread:
The self-archiving sweepstakes (began February 7, 2003)
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2662.html
Dear Colleagues,
It would be nice to get an estimate of the growth of the number of Open
Access scientific documents (S. Harnad: immediate
the
process!
Yours Eberhard R. Hilf
h...@isn-oldenburg.de
Initial AmSci Topic Thread:
The self-archiving sweepstakes
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2662.html
Prior AmSci Topic Thread:
The self-archiving sweepstakes
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2662.htmlA
Canada and Scotland have joined UK, US, Australia, India and Norway in
edging toward mandated self-archiving:
Mandatory self-archiving of peer-reviewed research
On 26-May-04, at 1:56 PM, David Goodman wrote:
Is it the library that is responsible for the cost of self-archiving?
Is it the library that runs the server, or pays for the Internet
connection? Is it the library that does the proofreading, or scans
the photographs?
Many libraries do have
At 01:45 27/05/04 +0100, Heather Morrison wrote:
An institutional repository is merely a new form of collection of
information.
Not *merely* a collection, it is much more than that. Evidence from ArXiv
shows that open access archives become a focus for intense social activity
and interaction
that in the Netherlands, under DARE,
all universities have set up OA Eprint Archives and that they
already contain 20,000 articles. As noted in the prior posting,
the Netherlands is already 5th in the international self-archiving
sweepstakes:
* United States (54)
* United
Dear Leo
I am a little puzzled by your comment that:
In The Netherlands ... For those who neglect the (price of) the trajectory
from submission to publication in a toll gated journal, self archiving is the
perfect solution: high quality articles for free! For those who pay for this
trajectory,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Tom Abeles wrote:
Harnad's observation is interesting if the prime reason for publishing
were to share with colleagues. Unfortunately this ideal gets distorted by
the myriad of reasons to publish or even not to publish, regardless of the
disciplines. And, as an aside, the
Hi Steve
I think we are in agreement here.
Perhaps one of the issues is that the open archives concept also
exposes all of these millions of refereed articles to the public at
large. Academics might find that the Sokal Affair was benign compared
to a potential fire storm in a time of shrinking
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Tom Abeles wrote:
Perhaps one of the issues is that the open archives concept also
exposes all of these millions of refereed articles to the public at
large. Academics might find that the Sokal Affair was benign compared
to a potential fire storm in a time of shrinking
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, H.M. Gladney wrote:
http://lists.openlib.org/pipermail/oai-eprints/2003-February/38.html
sh It has nothing -- repeat, nothing -- to do with either publishers
sh or economists: It is purely between the research community and itself.
Harnad seems to take a narrow and
13 matches
Mail list logo