Re:[Goanet] How did science begin?

From: Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Christian Theology is a science > > > > How about Islamic Theology, Hindu Theology, > Zoroastrian Theology, Greek Theology or Egyptian > Theology? Are they sciences too? Which one of them is > right? > > *--In all religions there is a lot of good and val

Re:[Goanet] How did science begin?

Fr. Ivo wrote: > >Christian Theology is a science > How about Islamic Theology, Hindu Theology, Zoroastrian Theology, Greek Theology or Egyptian Theology? Are they sciences too? Which one of them is right? > >It is anachronistic error to read the Bible and try to >find errors in the light of mode

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

From: Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Fr. Ivo, > > I provide below answers to some of your questions, and > a list of problems and questions with what you wrote: > > 1. Modern science is rational, theoretical and > empirical in nature. *--This is the definition of empirical science. There

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Fr. Ivo, [...] 2. You conveniently gloss over the fact that the Bible and traditional Christian theology contain beliefs and explanations about natural phenomena that modern science has shown to be complet

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

Fr. Ivo, I provide below answers to some of your questions, and a list of problems and questions with what you wrote: 1. Modern science is rational, theoretical and empirical in nature. 2. You conveniently gloss over the fact that the Bible and traditional Christian theology contain beliefs and

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

>From Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- "Fr. Ivo Da C. Souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > >*--Your statements are as good as mine, because you > >are repeating them without understanding (or trying > to >understand) the point in question. > > > > 1. No other subject can replace scien

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

--- "Fr. Ivo Da C. Souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >*--Your statements are as good as mine, because you >are repeating them without understanding (or trying to >understand) the point in question. > Fr. Ivo, Here are the points that I want to make in response to your latest post under this t

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

Dear Fr. Ivo, As usual, you make many categorical assertions without providing any reasons for making them. In fact, you are repeating some of the same statements you have made several times before. All of these statements have been refuted or questioned by me or someone else. So I will only make

[Goanet] How did science begin?

Dr.Santosh Helekar wrote: >" According to the prevailing scientific hypothesis > there was no "BEFORE" before the Big Bang. Time itself > began with the Big Bang. Space, time, matter/energy > emerged at the moment of the Big Bang. This is > currently the most parsimonious explanation from the > ava

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

--- "Fr. Ivo Da C. Souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -*Eicosanoid Balance and Essential Fatty Acids > by Ron Kennedy, M.D., Santa Rosa, California > ... > It is a scientist who speaks! Deo Gratias! Amen! > It is not a scientist who speaks! It is an alternative medi

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

--- Mario Goveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >So, what is it? A hypothesis that "can be supported >by objective evidence" or merely a "plausible" working >hypothesis that awaits objective physical evidence >to be more than just plausible? > Simple! Theories regarding the origin of the universe

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

--- "Fr. Ivo Da C. Souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The scientists are trying to find the origins of >the Universe and of humankind. In this process of >research Science has recourse to conjectures, >assumptions, opinions, probabilities, beliefs, >guess... > Fr. Ivo, Do you have any reason

Re: [Goanet] How did science begin?

--- Mario Goveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I wonder what science has to say about what existed >BEFORE the Big Bang? > According to the prevailing scientific hypothesis there was no "BEFORE" before the Big Bang. Time itself began with the Big Bang. Space, time, matter/energy emerged at the mo

Re: [Goanet]How did science begin?

I wonder what science has to say about what existed BEFORE the Big Bang? --- "Fr. Ivo Da C. Souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fr.Ivo wrote: > >What the scientists are trying to find is also > >opinion. > > Dr.Santosh Helekar says: > The above statement is also false. It is well > known t