RE: [Goanet] Re: Review on the Reviewer

2006-04-25 Thread D'Souza, Avelino
Hi Gilbert, Mehta's review is the first review of Edna's "Holy Warriors". The "praiseworthy review" what you are talking about is from the publisher's site. As you know, all publishers will carry praise-worthy comments about their product on their site; it is in their interest to sell the book a

[Goanet] Re: Review on the Reviewer

2006-04-25 Thread gilbertlaw
Hi George, As usual, you get so base in your response and personal attacks. I hope your post does not reflect where your mind is! Do I owe Avelino an apology? Yes I did think he wrote the review. And I noticed Mario made the same judgement call, and very likely Victor. I did apologize to Aveli

[Goanet] Re: Review on the Reviewer

2006-04-25 Thread George Pinto
Hi Gilbert, You cannot write about Goan ayatollahs, wading in boots through some Goan posts and write negatively of "Goan character" and not expect a taste of your own medicine. I am glad you made an apology to the good Avelino. Regards, George _ D

[Goanet] Re: Review on the Reviewer

2006-04-23 Thread George Pinto
Hi Gilbert I am a bit surprised that having been caught with your fly open in cyberspace, you did not choose to publicly apologize to Avelino after assuming he wrote a less than flattering review of Edna Fernandes' book. He did not write the review and your comments should have been withdrawn.

[Goanet] Re: Review on the Reviewer

2006-04-23 Thread gilbertlaw
Re: Review on "Holy Warriors" by Edna Fernandes Victor makes several important points. I have not read the original book. Yet as Victor points out, I have written books, non-scientific and scientific articles, which have been published. Hence, I have dealt with many reviewers and commentator