[Goanet]Re: Male nuns (since Fred insists on maintaining the original thread even if it is no longer significant)

2005-05-31 Thread Cecil Pinto
Frederick Noronha wrote: Cecil, Please respect my silence on this issue; I *am* trying to ignore you. Cecil: Since you have asked politely I will respect your request for silence on this issue. In future let me know when you are ignoring me. Sometimes silence can be read as an admission of err

[Goanet]Re: Male nuns? [Subsequently changed to other subject-lines, including 'Goanet Rules & Benevolent Dictatorships']

2005-05-31 Thread Frederick Noronha (FN)
First Bosco and now Miguel speaking on behalf of Fred. I wonder why? If Fred is 'on the move' and too busy to defend his statements on 'benevolent dictatorship' and a 'vision' for GoaNet, he can at least say so and I will keep silent till he is no longer 'moving' and is able to speak for hims

[Goanet]Re: Male nuns

2005-04-27 Thread Philip Thomas
[FN, April 26] This make a lot of sense to me. [April 26] On goanet we sure do seem to be fighting over SOMETHING! What it is I dont know yet. I am also not sure what social capital is being built. But, hey, good luck with the efforts!

[Goanet]Re: Male nuns?

2005-04-26 Thread Frederick Noronha (FN)
Cecil Pinto wrote: Should the selection of GoaNet Moderators and Administrators be by popular opinion or by Founders and current rulers? My personal view is that Net-based ventures are best run as benevolent dictatorships. With people getting peer-acceptance on the basis of the work they put in.