Oct 14

Some of you have heard me tell the story of captive-bred whooping cranes at
the International Crane Foundation in Wisconsin. In particular, how they
were taught to migrate. That story always leaves me awestruck: how do you
teach something that is essentially instinct?

Bird migration is a remarkable phenomenon any way you look at it. What
happens to it as the climate changes? My Mint column for Oct 13 considers
that question.

To migrate or not to migrate,
https://www.livemint.com/opinion/columns/to-migrate-or-not-to-migrate-11697136127931.html

yours,
dilip

---

To migrate or not to migrate


There's something compelling about bird migration. The way birds return to
the same spot year after year, the distances they travel, how relatively
small bodies pack enough muscle for long flights, why such long flights at
all.

Some years ago I watched a short film about captive-bred whooping cranes.
Being so, they don't know how and where to migrate. So humans taught them,
by flying along the route in a micro-light aircraft, the eager bird
students trailing behind. Just thinking of the sheer human audacity of
teaching this (bird) life skill is a reminder of the how remarkable the
instinct to migrate is.

Then there's a bird that, in 2020, flew from Alaska to New Zealand.
Nonstop. We know it did because of the stellite tracking device fitted on
the bird. This is a distance of over 12,000km, and this little bar-tailed
godwit touched down 11 days after it took flight. So it kept up a steady
45kmph across a vast ocean with no land for hundreds of miles in any
direction. The 12,000km is a new world record, and it was set by a
relatively nondescript, relatively small (about 300gm) shore-bird.

All this might fill you with wonder, as it does me. How do you teach
something that is normally pure instinct, and teach it across species
boundaries? How does a small bird find the energy and strength for a 12,000
km flight?

But as interesting as those conundrums are, something else that migrating
birds do is possibly worrying. Simply because they travel these great
distances, they carry and spread micro-organisms across the world. Some of
those can be dangerous to humans. Of course this isn't new knowledge -
we've known it for a while. But now there's a phenomenon that even birds
might need to take into account: climate change.

Think of the weather, just in 2023. Early last month, for example, Phoenix
broke a record of 53 days in a calendar year of temperatures over 110°F
(about 43.5°C) - that record set only three years ago. Extreme rainfall has
caused destructive flooding in Himachal Pradesh, Sydney and now New York.
There have been wildfires and hurricanes around the world.

If all this is really evidence that temperatures are rising and moisture
patterns are mutating around the world - that climate change is happening,
in other words - then surely birds' migratory habits will change as well.
In fact, there's evidence it's already happening. Bird scientists are
especially concerned about migration paths to or near the Arctic, because
no other part of our planet is warming as quickly. In 2006, for example, a
team of researchers reported that:

"Several bird species have advanced the timing of their spring migration in
response to recent climate change. ... [In fact] long-distance migrants
have advanced their spring arrival in Scandinavia ... We argue that this
may reflect a climate-driven evolutionary change in the timing of spring
migration." ("Rapid Advance of Spring Arrival Dates in Long-Distance
Migratory Birds", Niclas Jonzén et al, Science, 30 June 2006).

What these changes imply for the spread of pathogens is something
scientists are trying to find out. For example, there's a bird observatory
and preserve in Sweden called Ottenby. For a lot of migratory birds, it is
a temporary halt on their migratory routes. In the spring, they stop there
on their way to spending the summer in points further north. In the autumn,
they stop there on their way south, some flying on all the way to Africa.

During those stopovers, the birds do what birds (and maybe the rest of us)
must: they excrete. Their droppings contain the pathogens they have been
carrying. This contaminates the water bodies at Ottenby. In turn, other
birds who stop in Ottenby may pick up those infections and may carry them
to their final migratory destinations. Ottenby becomes, as a recent article
remarks, "a global relay system for transmission" ("Flight Risks", Science,
27 September 2023,
https://www.science.org/content/article/changing-bird-migrations-threaten-bring-new-infectious-diseases-humans).
One Swedish ornithologist reports having found all these pathogens in birds
in the 20 years he has been working at Ottenby: "influenza and Newcastle
disease virus, Campylobacter, Salmonella, Yersinia, tick-borne encephalitis
virus, Candidatus, Babesia, Rickettsia, and papillomavirus."

But what if migratory habits change? Some scientists think that there are
birds that, responding to rising temperatures, will fly faster while
migrating in search of cooler places. That increased speed uses up more
energy, and there are studies that show this makes them more susceptible to
diseases.

Other birds might respond to climate change by choosing to stay put and
breed in a spot like Ottenby, instead of using it as a stopover enroute to
somewhere else. This can, strangely enough, mean it will become a breeding
ground for pathogens. If Ottenby is largely a stopover for many different
birds, an infected bird is pretty likely to pass on its viruses to other
bird species, in which the viruses may not survive. This is what
evolutionary scientists know as the "dilution effect": higher biodiversity
decreases successful pathogen transmission. But if many birds of the same
species make their home in Ottenby, that negates the dilution effect.

There's another, related, consideration as well. Birds in a migratory flock
who are infected with a particularly nasty virus will tend to fall behind
the others. That makes it more difficult to transfer the virus to other,
uninfected birds. Thus it may simply die out. But if the whole flock
chooses to settle in Ottenby, the virus can easily make the leap to nearby
uninfected birds. Thus it may spread and survive.

Studying all this is no academic exercise. We know what happened with the
2.3.4.4b variant of avian flu virus H5N1, always called "highly
pathogenic". It originated in poultry in South Korea in 2014 and quickly
made the leap to migratory birds. Birdwatchers "mapped in exquisite detail"
- says the same Science article - how it travelled along migratory paths.
By 2022, it had made its way through the Bering Strait to North America's
Pacific Coast, and through Iceland to the Atlantic Coast. This year,
ornithologists have found the variant among birds in Greenland, which is
warming quickly with climate change. The new places those birds choose to
migrate to are, thus, potential new places for an outbreak of this
destructive virus.

So yes, there's something compelling about bird migration, also because it
is a phenomenon so finely and delicately tuned to climate. The climate
changes. What happens to that tuning?

-- 
My book with Joy Ma: "The Deoliwallahs"
Twitter: @DeathEndsFun
Death Ends Fun: http://dcubed.blogspot.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Dilip's essays" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dilips-essays+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dilips-essays/CAEiMe8o%3DQanWPzEb-v047TV%2BJtcduUEsC%2BHf8%3DgV8XtQHe-Hxw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to