Santosh Helekar:
In 2010 alone, the Maoists killed a total of 526 innocent civilians and
security personnel.
Response:
Here are some reports on criminal behavior displayed by security forces. It
would be interesting to see how well Santosh is able to defend and justify
such behaviour.
Excerpts:
I was waiting to see if Marshall was willing to admit that Maoists were also
criminals. But I guess not. It is all about one-sided ideological justice. They
recognize criminality only on one side, not their own. How can you trust these
guys to write anything that is impartial?
As far as the
Here is more incredible insight from the Goanet moderator in support
of his credibility and lack of bias:
My quote:
In 2010 alone, the Maoists killed a total of 526 innocent civilians
and security personnel.
Response from Bosco:
I am wondering whether the above comment is implicitly or explicity
Santosh Helekar:
Is he saying that we need less people like Mashelkar and more people like
Arundhati Roy?
Response:
India needs more people like Mashelkar as well as Arundhati Roy, Medha
Patkar, Teesta Setalvad and Dr Binayak Sen. They are the voices of the
underdog, the downtrodden and the
--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Marshall Mendonza mmendonz...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a measure of their situation that the poor adivasis who are
exploited are condemned as maoists when they fight back unable to
tolerate injustice any longer, but the criminals in uniform who can kill,
maim and torture
From: Santosh Helekar
--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Marshall Mendonza wrote:
It is a measure of their situation that the poor adivasis who are
exploited are condemned as maoists when they fight back unable to
tolerate injustice any longer, but the criminals in uniform who can
kill, maim and torture
How do you build a great India on a foundation of moral and ethical turpitude,
asks Anthony Simoes
Sunday, 6 February 2011, the Herald front page report states: 'Goa should be
the happiest state in the world by 2035; where every Goan will do well, there
is harmony, pristine nature and
I can understand the point here that there is a huge difference between the
rich and the poor in India, and that this difference has increased over the
last decade or so, as the rich have become richer and many poor people have
entered the middle class. But I don't understand the rest of the
