Dear S. Sawaikar, Do not worry about grammar; people have in general moved on. Those were things in the past. As far as I can tell, writers on this site are no longer looking for "grammatical mistakes." There could be a couple of holdouts. Btw, my grammar is not anything to crow about (work in progress), and people leave me alone -- grammar wise. Of course if I was writing a book then I would use the skills of those around me including my wife.
Now, getting into the tangential, but I daresay the sensible too. The following couplet by one of our grammarians as pointed in a book by F. Max Mueller (Paris 5th April 1866) displayss a sense of scholarly humor. "Guna, Vriddhi, Guna , Vriddhi, prohibition, option, again Vriddhi and then exception, these, with the change of ri into a semi-vowel in the first instance, are the nine results." I doubt whether, even if we had grammarian's on this site; that they would come remotely close to a Panini, or a Bhattojidikshita, leave alone a Colebrooke, Bopp, Westergaard, or Fechia. I do feel though that there are posters who intentionally twist the grammar to inject ambiguity, and obfuscate. But we have to take it all in the mix. Goanet is a collection of various personalities.We should just take from them, what moves us. So, in humanism -- Tathata. venantius j pinto > From: sawaikars292 <sawaikars...@gmail.com> > Subject: [Goanet] ?Every Indian should obey court decision/verdict? is > this statement is correct? > I know that the writers of this site look to the grammatical mistakes? > I request them to look on humanitarian ground not on grammar. > > With any regards. > S. Sawaikar >
