Re: ". . .neither illegal NOR was it obstruction of Justice"o
> On Jan 25, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Tim de Mello wrote:
>
> Dear Jose:
> Totally disagree. One should not go by technical definitions here.
> Question is was it morally right?
> Anyway let us leave it at ..
Comment:
D
t; Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:03:04 -0500
> To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
> Subject: Re: [Goanet] FW: Defrocked Priests
>
> On Jan 25, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Tim de Mello wrote:
>
> "Do you think that not passing the info that Pope Benedict had about the
> offending priests
On Jan 25, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Tim de Mello wrote:
"Do you think that not passing the info that Pope Benedict had about the
offending priests to lawful authorities was the right thing for him to have
done?"
No.
But, it was neither illegal NOR was it obstruction of Justice.
jc
ola...@gmail.com
> To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
> Subject: Re: [Goanet] FW: Defrocked Priests
>
> On 24 January 2014 11:36, Tim de Mello wrote:
>
> You ask: "Are You suggesting that the Vatican in 2014 should have jailed
> these folks?"
>
> What would you sugg
On 24 January 2014 11:36, Tim de Mello wrote:
You ask: "Are You suggesting that the Vatican in 2014 should have jailed
these folks?"
What would you suggest for these pedophiles who have destroyed countless
lives?
Should they be allowed to offend again?
--
My dear Tim,
Here you go again .
ate: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:36:01 -0500
> To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
> Subject: Re: [Goanet] FW: Defrocked Priests
>
> On Jan 22, 2014, at 8:54 PM, Tim de Mello wrote:
>
> "(1)Previously they were just subjected to Canon Law."
>
> "(2)The names and whereabout
On Jan 22, 2014, at 8:54 PM, Tim de Mello wrote:
"(1)Previously they were just subjected to Canon Law."
"(2)The names and whereabouts of priests on the list have yet to be disclosed
by the Vatican."
"(3)The maximum penalty for a priest convicted by a church tribunal is
essentially losing his
ourt. There is plenty of
evidence to support this.
Now we shall see true justice being meted out to these offending priests.
Tim de Mello
> From: alfredtava...@hotmail.com
> To: goanet@lists.goanet.org; goa...@goanet.org
> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:06:22 +0100
> Subj
Tim, top o' the year to you & Yours
I detect a flaw in your contention.
If, at all, the Catholic clergy is shielded, which is not true, from
prosecution,
in courts of law, for civil/criminal offences presumed commited, by the virtue
of the defrock-ation (re-cullotization?) by Benedict XVl,
